These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29195438)

  • 1. L2 voice recognition: The role of speaker-, listener-, and stimulus-related factors.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3058. PubMed ID: 29195438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation to novel foreign-accented speech and retention of benefit following training: Influence of aging and hearing loss.
    Bieber RE; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2800. PubMed ID: 28464671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Training listeners to report the acoustic correlate of formant-frequency scaling using synthetic voices.
    Barreda S; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1065-77. PubMed ID: 23363122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech.
    McAuliffe MJ; Gibson EM; Kerr SE; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1358-68. PubMed ID: 23927132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.
    Sell G; Suied C; Elhilali M; Shamma S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):911-22. PubMed ID: 25698023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of English vowels by bilingual Chinese-English and corresponding monolingual listeners.
    Yang J; Fox RA
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):215-37. PubMed ID: 25102607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Pickett EJ; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1132-48. PubMed ID: 27036250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.
    Kong YY; Jesse A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):373. PubMed ID: 28147573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
    Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender differences in familiar voice identification.
    Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():131-40. PubMed ID: 23168357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High stimulus variability in nonnative speech learning supports formation of abstract categories: evidence from Japanese geminates.
    Sadakata M; McQueen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1324-35. PubMed ID: 23927129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of musical experience on learning lexical tone categories.
    Zhao TC; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1452-63. PubMed ID: 25786956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clear speech and lexical competition in younger and older adult listeners.
    Van Engen KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1067. PubMed ID: 28863602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adapting to suprasegmental lexical stress errors in foreign-accented speech.
    Reinisch E; Weber A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1165-76. PubMed ID: 22894235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms.
    Wilson RH; Sanchez VA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):412-441. PubMed ID: 31968207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of short-time acoustic temporal fine structure cues in sentence recognition for normal-hearing listeners.
    Hou L; Xu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):EL127. PubMed ID: 29495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.