These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29196209)

  • 1. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
    Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Nezolosky MD; Vastola ME; Labe SA; Boldbaatar N; King MT; Martin NE; Orio PF; Beard CJ; Hoffman KE; Trinh QD; Spratt DE; Feng FY; Nguyen PL
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28753811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance.
    Herkommer K; Maier N; Ankerst DP; Schiele S; Gschwend JE; Meissner VH
    World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 33048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
    Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
    Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
    Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of pretreatment PSA on risk stratification in men with Gleason 6 prostate cancer: Implications for active surveillance.
    Monfared S; Fleishman A; Korets R; Chang P; Wagner A; Bubley G; Kaplan I; Olumi AF; Gershman B
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):783.e21-783.e30. PubMed ID: 33992521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
    Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer.
    Grossfeld GD; Latini DM; Lubeck DP; Mehta SS; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 12478126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is clinical stage T2c prostate cancer an intermediate- or high-risk disease?
    Klaassen Z; Singh AA; Howard LE; Feng Z; Trock B; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Partin A; Han M; Freedland SJ
    Cancer; 2015 May; 121(9):1414-21. PubMed ID: 25492369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
    Leeman JE; Chen MH; Huland H; Graefen M; D'Amico AV; Tilki D
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Dec; 17(6):e1116-e1121. PubMed ID: 31601512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.
    Faisal FA; Sundi D; Pierorazio PM; Ball MW; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE
    BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E120-E129. PubMed ID: 24731026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
    Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing patient selection for prostate monotherapy.
    Lee AK; Schultz D; Renshaw AA; Richie JP; D'Amico AV
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 11172948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
    Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
    Verep S; Erdem S; Ozluk Y; Kilicaslan I; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Prostate; 2019 Sep; 79(13):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 31269285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.