These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29196632)

  • 1. Automated VSS-based Burn Scar Assessment using Combined Texture and Color Features of Digital Images in Error-Correcting Output Coding.
    Pham TD; Karlsson M; Andersson CM; Mirdell R; Sjoberg F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):16744. PubMed ID: 29196632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
    Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE
    J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in subjective vs objective burn scar assessment over time: does the patient agree with what we think?
    Martin D; Umraw N; Gomez M; Cartotto R
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2003; 24(4):239-44; discussion 238. PubMed ID: 14501421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers.
    Thompson CM; Sood RF; Honari S; Carrougher GJ; Gibran NS
    Burns; 2015 Nov; 41(7):1442-8. PubMed ID: 26141527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to evaluate scar colour after burn injuries - A clinical comparison of the Mexameter® and the subjective scar assessment (POSAS/VSS).
    Bagheri M; von Kohout M; Fuchs PC; Seyhan H; Stromps JP; Lefering R; Opländer C; Schiefer JL
    Burns; 2024 Apr; 50(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 38097444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
    Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
    Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health professionals' and consumers' opinion: what is considered important when rating burn scars from photographs?
    Simons M; Tyack Z
    J Burn Care Res; 2011; 32(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 21233729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume.
    Nedelec B; Shankowsky HA; Tredget EE
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2000; 21(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 10850901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
    Tyack Z; Simons M; Spinks A; Wasiak J
    Burns; 2012 Feb; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation of a burn scar assessment system by ultrasound techniques.
    Du YC; Lin CM; Chen YF; Chen CL; Chen T
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2328-31. PubMed ID: 17945707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A modeling approach for burn scar assessment using natural features and elastic property.
    Zhang Y; Goldgof DB; Sarkar S; Tsap LV
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1325-9. PubMed ID: 15493699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low Level Laser Therapy--a conservative approach to the burn scar?
    Gaida K; Koller R; Isler C; Aytekin O; Al-Awami M; Meissl G; Frey M
    Burns; 2004 Jun; 30(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15145195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera.
    Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z
    Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A guide to choosing a burn scar rating scale for clinical or research use.
    Tyack Z; Wasiak J; Spinks A; Kimble R; Simons M
    Burns; 2013 Nov; 39(7):1341-50. PubMed ID: 23768711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
    Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
    Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The recovery of post-burn hypertrophic scar in a monitored pressure therapy intervention programme and the timing of intervention.
    Li P; Li-Tsang CWP; Deng X; Wang X; Wang H; Zhang Y; Tan Z; He C
    Burns; 2018 Sep; 44(6):1451-1467. PubMed ID: 29887351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dermal Remodeling of Burn Scar by Fractional CO2 Laser.
    Lee SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Song KY; Ryu HJ
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 27519176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.
    Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
    Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinimetric overview of scar assessment scales.
    van der Wal MB; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    J Burn Care Res; 2012; 33(2):e79-87. PubMed ID: 22249102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrapulsed fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: evaluation of an in-patient controlled, standardized treatment approach.
    Poetschke J; Dornseifer U; Clementoni MT; Reinholz M; Schwaiger H; Steckmeier S; Ruzicka T; Gauglitz GG
    Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Jul; 32(5):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 28401348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.