343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29197325)
1. Genomic prediction accuracies in space and time for height and wood density of Douglas-fir using exome capture as the genotyping platform.
Thistlethwaite FR; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Porth I; Chen C; Stoehr MU; El-Kassaby YA
BMC Genomics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):930. PubMed ID: 29197325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir.
Thistlethwaite FR; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Porth I; Chen C; Stoehr MU; El-Kassaby YA
Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Jun; 122(6):848-863. PubMed ID: 30631145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction accuracies for growth and wood attributes of interior spruce in space using genotyping-by-sequencing.
Gamal El-Dien O; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Chen C; Porth I; El-Kassaby YA
BMC Genomics; 2015 May; 16(1):370. PubMed ID: 25956247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in two control-pollinated progeny trials using exome capture as the genotyping platform in Norway spruce.
Chen ZQ; Baison J; Pan J; Karlsson B; Andersson B; Westin J; García-Gil MR; Wu HX
BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):946. PubMed ID: 30563448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linkage disequilibrium vs. pedigree: Genomic selection prediction accuracy in conifer species.
Thistlethwaite FR; Gamal El-Dien O; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Porth I; Chen C; Stoehr MU; Ingvarsson PK; El-Kassaby YA
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0232201. PubMed ID: 32520936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of
Thavamanikumar S; Arnold RJ; Luo J; Thumma BR
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3751-3763. PubMed ID: 32788286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic selection for growth and wood quality in Eucalyptus: capturing the missing heritability and accelerating breeding for complex traits in forest trees.
Resende MDV; Resende MFR; Sansaloni CP; Petroli CD; Missiaggia AA; Aguiar AM; Abad JM; Takahashi EK; Rosado AM; Faria DA; Pappas GJ; Kilian A; Grattapaglia D
New Phytol; 2012 Apr; 194(1):116-128. PubMed ID: 22309312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting the accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in an advanced-breeding population of black spruce (Picea mariana).
Lenz PRN; Beaulieu J; Mansfield SD; Clément S; Desponts M; Bousquet J
BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):335. PubMed ID: 28454519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce.
Beaulieu J; Doerksen TK; MacKay J; Rainville A; Bousquet J
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1048. PubMed ID: 25442968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Genomic Selection Models to Predict Flowering Time and Spike Grain Number in Two Hexaploid Wheat Doubled Haploid Populations.
Thavamanikumar S; Dolferus R; Thumma BR
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jul; 5(10):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26206349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.
Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J
BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic Prediction of Manganese Efficiency in Winter Barley.
Leplat F; Jensen J; Madsen P
Plant Genome; 2016 Jul; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 27898822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic prediction for hastening and improving efficiency of forward selection in conifer polycross mating designs: an example from white spruce.
Lenz PRN; Nadeau S; Azaiez A; Gérardi S; Deslauriers M; Perron M; Isabel N; Beaulieu J; Bousquet J
Heredity (Edinb); 2020 Apr; 124(4):562-578. PubMed ID: 31969718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic selection in American mink (Neovison vison) using a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction model for size and quality traits graded on live mink.
Villumsen TM; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Asp T; Lund MS
J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33515480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
