583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29197382)
1. Beyond quality improvement: exploring why primary care teams engage in a voluntary audit and feedback program.
Wagner DJ; Durbin J; Barnsley J; Ivers NM
BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Dec; 17(1):803. PubMed ID: 29197382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement without management: qualitative evaluation of a voluntary audit & feedback intervention for primary care teams.
Wagner DJ; Durbin J; Barnsley J; Ivers NM
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 19(1):419. PubMed ID: 31234916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of the practice facilitators in Ontario primary healthcare quality improvement.
Kotecha J; Han H; Green M; Russell G; Martin MI; Birtwhistle R
BMC Fam Pract; 2015 Jul; 16():93. PubMed ID: 26224104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Helping primary care teams emerge through a quality improvement program.
Hilts L; Howard M; Price D; Risdon C; Agarwal G; Childs A
Fam Pract; 2013 Apr; 30(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 22990026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Informing implementation of quality improvement in Australian primary care.
Hespe C; Rychetnik L; Peiris D; Harris M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 18(1):287. PubMed ID: 29661247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Barriers and enablers to the implementation of a complex quality improvement intervention for acute kidney injury: A qualitative evaluation of stakeholder perceptions of the Tackling AKI study.
Lamming L; McDonach E; Mohammed MA; Stoves J; Lewington AJ; Roberts R; Samarasinghe Y; Shah N; Fluck RJ; Jackson N; Johnson M; Jones C; Selby NM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222444. PubMed ID: 31539376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motivating and engaging frontline providers in measuring and improving team clinical performance.
Hysong SJ; Francis J; Petersen LA
BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 May; 28(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 30824492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Embedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation science.
Robinson TE; Janssen A; Harnett P; Museth KE; Provan PJ; Hills DJ; Shaw T
Aust Health Rev; 2017 Jul; 41(3):291-296. PubMed ID: 27372543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of quality improvement skills by primary care teams: case study of a large academic practice.
Watts B; Lawrence RH; Singh S; Wagner C; Augustine S; Singh MK
J Prim Care Community Health; 2014 Apr; 5(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 24474666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examining clinical performance feedback in Patient-Aligned Care Teams.
Hysong SJ; Knox MK; Haidet P
J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Jul; 29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S667-74. PubMed ID: 24715398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining administrative data feedback, reflection and action planning to engage primary care professionals in quality improvement: qualitative assessment of short term program outcomes.
Vachon B; Désorcy B; Gaboury I; Camirand M; Rodrigue J; Quesnel L; Guimond C; Labelle M; Huynh AT; Grimshaw J
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():391. PubMed ID: 26384648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of a quality improvement program on primary healthcare in Canada: a mixed-method evaluation.
Harris SB; Green ME; Brown JB; Roberts S; Russell G; Fournie M; Webster-Bogaert S; Paquette-Warren J; Kotecha J; Han H; Thind A; Stewart M; Reichert S; Tompkins JW; Birtwhistle R
Health Policy; 2015 Apr; 119(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 25476553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contextual factors that influence quality improvement implementation in primary care: The role of organizations, teams, and individuals.
Shea CM; Turner K; Albritton J; Reiter KL
Health Care Manage Rev; 2018; 43(3):261-269. PubMed ID: 29533271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis.
Brindle ME; Henrich N; Foster A; Marks S; Rose M; Welsh R; Berry W
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Mar; 18(1):210. PubMed ID: 29580254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach.
Pandhi N; Kraft S; Berkson S; Davis S; Kamnetz S; Koslov S; Trowbridge E; Caplan W
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Nov; 18(1):847. PubMed ID: 30413205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are quality improvement plans perceived to improve the quality of primary care in Ontario? Qualitative study.
Tran K; Webster F; Ivers NM; Laupacis A; Dhalla IA
Can Fam Physician; 2021 Oct; 67(10):759-766. PubMed ID: 34649902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What drives adoption of a computerised, multifaceted quality improvement intervention for cardiovascular disease management in primary healthcare settings? A mixed methods analysis using normalisation process theory.
Patel B; Usherwood T; Harris M; Patel A; Panaretto K; Zwar N; Peiris D
Implement Sci; 2018 Nov; 13(1):140. PubMed ID: 30419934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ontario's emergency department process improvement program: the experience of implementation.
Rotteau L; Webster F; Salkeld E; Hellings C; Guttmann A; Vermeulen MJ; Bell RS; Zwarenstein M; Rowe BH; Nigam A; Schull MJ;
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jun; 22(6):720-9. PubMed ID: 25996451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Key components of external facilitation in an acute stroke quality improvement collaborative in the Veterans Health Administration.
Bidassie B; Williams LS; Woodward-Hagg H; Matthias MS; Damush TM
Implement Sci; 2015 May; 10():69. PubMed ID: 25971405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A qualitative study of the variable effects of audit and feedback in the ICU.
Sinuff T; Muscedere J; Rozmovits L; Dale CM; Scales DC
BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Jun; 24(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 25918432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
