130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29198611)
1. Accurate haplotype imputation with individualized ancestry-adjusted reference panels.
Song Q; Xu W; Li W; He S; Liu J; Wang G; Ma L
Genomics; 2018 Sep; 110(5):329-335. PubMed ID: 29198611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of genotype imputation performance using 1000 Genomes in African American studies.
Hancock DB; Levy JL; Gaddis NC; Bierut LJ; Saccone NL; Page GP; Johnson EO
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50610. PubMed ID: 23226329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive evaluation of imputation performance in African Americans.
Chanda P; Yuhki N; Li M; Bader JS; Hartz A; Boerwinkle E; Kao WH; Arking DE
J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 57(7):411-21. PubMed ID: 22648186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Practical considerations for imputation of untyped markers in admixed populations.
Shriner D; Adeyemo A; Chen G; Rotimi CN
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 19918757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genotype imputation performance of three reference panels using African ancestry individuals.
Vergara C; Parker MM; Franco L; Cho MH; Valencia-Duarte AV; Beaty TH; Duggal P
Hum Genet; 2018 Apr; 137(4):281-292. PubMed ID: 29637265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rare variant genotype imputation with thousands of study-specific whole-genome sequences: implications for cost-effective study designs.
Pistis G; Porcu E; Vrieze SI; Sidore C; Steri M; Danjou F; Busonero F; Mulas A; Zoledziewska M; Maschio A; Brennan C; Lai S; Miller MB; Marcelli M; Urru MF; Pitzalis M; Lyons RH; Kang HM; Jones CM; Angius A; Iacono WG; Schlessinger D; McGue M; Cucca F; Abecasis GR; Sanna S
Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Jul; 23(7):975-83. PubMed ID: 25293720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Haplotype variation and genotype imputation in African populations.
Huang L; Jakobsson M; Pemberton TJ; Ibrahim M; Nyambo T; Omar S; Pritchard JK; Tishkoff SA; Rosenberg NA
Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(8):766-80. PubMed ID: 22125220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A combined reference panel from the 1000 Genomes and UK10K projects improved rare variant imputation in European and Chinese samples.
Chou WC; Zheng HF; Cheng CH; Yan H; Wang L; Han F; Richards JB; Karasik D; Kiel DP; Hsu YH
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39313. PubMed ID: 28004816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inclusion of Population-specific Reference Panel from India to the 1000 Genomes Phase 3 Panel Improves Imputation Accuracy.
Ahmad M; Sinha A; Ghosh S; Kumar V; Davila S; Yajnik CS; Chandak GR
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6733. PubMed ID: 28751670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved imputation accuracy of rare and low-frequency variants using population-specific high-coverage WGS-based imputation reference panel.
Mitt M; Kals M; Pärn K; Gabriel SB; Lander ES; Palotie A; Ripatti S; Morris AP; Metspalu A; Esko T; Mägi R; Palta P
Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Jun; 25(7):869-876. PubMed ID: 28401899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Opening the Black Box of Imputation Software to Study the Impact of Reference Panel Composition on Performance.
Dekeyser T; Génin E; Herzig AF
Genes (Basel); 2023 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 36833337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-accuracy haplotype imputation using unphased genotype data as the references.
Li W; Xu W; Fu G; Ma L; Richards J; Rao W; Bythwood T; Guo S; Song Q
Gene; 2015 Nov; 572(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 26232609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. References for Haplotype Imputation in the Big Data Era.
Li W; Xu W; Li Q; Ma L; Song Q
Mol Biol (Los Angel); 2015 Nov; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 27274952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A diverse ancestrally-matched reference panel increases genotype imputation accuracy in a underrepresented population.
Mauleekoonphairoj J; Tongsima S; Khongphatthanayothin A; Jurgens SJ; Zimmerman DS; Sutjaporn B; Wandee P; Bezzina CR; Nademanee K; Poovorawan Y
Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):12360. PubMed ID: 37524845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing.
Howie B; Fuchsberger C; Stephens M; Marchini J; Abecasis GR
Nat Genet; 2012 Jul; 44(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 22820512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How local reference panels improve imputation in French populations.
Herzig AF; Velo-Suárez L; ; ; Dina C; Redon R; Deleuze JF; Génin E
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):370. PubMed ID: 38172507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving power of association tests using multiple sets of imputed genotypes from distributed reference panels.
Zhou W; Fritsche LG; Das S; Zhang H; Nielsen JB; Holmen OL; Chen J; Lin M; Elvestad MB; Hveem K; Abecasis GR; Kang HM; Willer CJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 41(8):744-755. PubMed ID: 28861891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genotype Imputation for Latinos Using the HapMap and 1000 Genomes Project Reference Panels.
Gao X; Haritunians T; Marjoram P; McKean-Cowdin R; Torres M; Taylor KD; Rotter JI; Gauderman WJ; Varma R
Front Genet; 2012; 3():117. PubMed ID: 22754564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction of private genomes through reference-based genotype imputation.
Mosca MJ; Cho H
Genome Biol; 2023 Dec; 24(1):271. PubMed ID: 38053191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
