BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29198859)

  • 1. Selecting among three basic fitness landscape models: Additive, multiplicative and stickbreaking.
    Miller CR; Van Leuven JT; Wichman HA; Joyce P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Jul; 122():97-109. PubMed ID: 29198859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stickbreaking: a novel fitness landscape model that harbors epistasis and is consistent with commonly observed patterns of adaptive evolution.
    Nagel AC; Joyce P; Wichman HA; Miller CR
    Genetics; 2012 Feb; 190(2):655-67. PubMed ID: 22095084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epistasis and the Structure of Fitness Landscapes: Are Experimental Fitness Landscapes Compatible with Fisher's Geometric Model?
    Blanquart F; Bataillon T
    Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):847-62. PubMed ID: 27052568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferring fitness landscapes by regression produces biased estimates of epistasis.
    Otwinowski J; Plotkin JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(22):E2301-9. PubMed ID: 24843135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recombination and mutational robustness in neutral fitness landscapes.
    Klug A; Park SC; Krug J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1006884. PubMed ID: 31415555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of selected mutations and genotypic landscapes under Fisher's geometric model.
    Blanquart F; Achaz G; Bataillon T; Tenaillon O
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3537-54. PubMed ID: 25311558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additive Phenotypes Underlie Epistasis of Fitness Effects.
    Sackman AM; Rokyta DR
    Genetics; 2018 Jan; 208(1):339-348. PubMed ID: 29113978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Good Are Statistical Models at Approximating Complex Fitness Landscapes?
    du Plessis L; Leventhal GE; Bonhoeffer S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):2454-68. PubMed ID: 27189564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of bacterial recombination on adaptation on fitness landscapes with limited peak accessibility.
    Moradigaravand D; Engelstädter J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(10):e1002735. PubMed ID: 23133344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulating Evolution in Asexual Populations with Epistasis.
    Diaz-Uriarte R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2212():121-154. PubMed ID: 33733354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring epistasis in fitness landscapes: The correlation of fitness effects of mutations.
    Ferretti L; Schmiegelt B; Weinreich D; Yamauchi A; Kobayashi Y; Tajima F; Achaz G
    J Theor Biol; 2016 May; 396():132-43. PubMed ID: 26854875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The distribution of epistasis on simple fitness landscapes.
    Fraïsse C; Welch JJ
    Biol Lett; 2019 Apr; 15(4):20180881. PubMed ID: 31014191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution in the light of fitness landscape theory.
    Fragata I; Blanckaert A; Dias Louro MA; Liberles DA; Bank C
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 30583805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cluster partitions and fitness landscapes of the Drosophila fly microbiome.
    Eble H; Joswig M; Lamberti L; Ludington WB
    J Math Biol; 2019 Aug; 79(3):861-899. PubMed ID: 31101975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geometry of fitness landscapes: peaks, shapes and universal positive epistasis.
    Crona K; Krug J; Srivastava M
    J Math Biol; 2023 Mar; 86(4):62. PubMed ID: 36976406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes.
    de Visser JA; Park SC; Krug J
    Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174 Suppl 1():S15-30. PubMed ID: 19456267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fitness landscapes emerging from pharmacodynamic functions in the evolution of multidrug resistance.
    Engelstädter J
    J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):840-53. PubMed ID: 24720850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental selection and epistasis in an empirical phenotype-environment-fitness landscape.
    Chen JZ; Fowler DM; Tokuriki N
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2022 Apr; 6(4):427-438. PubMed ID: 35210579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genotypic Complexity of Fisher's Geometric Model.
    Hwang S; Park SC; Krug J
    Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):1049-1079. PubMed ID: 28450460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The changing geometry of a fitness landscape along an adaptive walk.
    Greene D; Crona K
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 May; 10(5):e1003520. PubMed ID: 24853069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.