35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29198947)
1. Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items.
Rezigalla AA; Eleragi AMESA; Elhussein AB; Alfaifi J; ALGhamdi MA; Al Ameer AY; Yahia AIO; Mohammed OA; Adam MIE
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):445. PubMed ID: 38658912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the ability to discriminate medical multiple-choice questions through the analysis of the competitive examination to assign residency positions in Spain.
Murias Quintana E; Rodríguez Castro J; Sánchez Lasheras F; Vega Villar J; Curbelo García JJ; Cadenas Rodríguez M; Baladrón Romero J
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):367. PubMed ID: 38570816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limitations of true score variance to measure discriminating power: psychometric simulation study.
Kang SS; MacDonald AW
J Abnorm Psychol; 2010 May; 119(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 20455603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AI in medical education: uses of AI in construction type A MCQs.
Rezigalla AA
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Mar; 24(1):247. PubMed ID: 38448870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Item difficulty index, discrimination index, and reliability of the 26 health professions licensing examinations in 2022, Korea: a psychometric study.
Kim YH; Kim BH; Kim J; Jung B; Bae S
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2023; 20():31. PubMed ID: 37990491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in Multiple-Choice Questions of Opposite Stem Orientations Based on a Novel Item Quality Measure.
Adeosun SO
Am J Pharm Educ; 2023 Mar; 87(2):ajpe8934. PubMed ID: 35470171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. SHARP (SHort Answer, Rationale Provision): A New Item Format to Assess Clinical Reasoning.
Runyon CR; Paniagua MA; Rosenthal FA; Veneziano AL; McNaughton L; Murray CT; Harik P
Acad Med; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38753971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usage of Multiple-Choice Items in Summative Examinations: Questionnaire Survey Among German Undergraduate Dental Training Programmes.
Rössler L; Herrmann M; Wiegand A; Kanzow P
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38712378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic Generation of Number Series Reasoning Items of High Difficulty.
Sun L; Liu Y; Luo F
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():884. PubMed ID: 31068870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the Influence of Item Characteristics in a Spatial Reasoning Task.
Shi Q; Wind SA; Lakin JM
J Intell; 2023 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 37623535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Hierarchical Model for Accuracy and Choice on Standardized Tests.
Culpepper SA; Balamuta JJ
Psychometrika; 2015 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 26608961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why Do Regular and Reversed Items Load on Separate Factors? Response Difficulty vs. Item Extremity.
Kam CCS
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Dec; 83(6):1085-1112. PubMed ID: 37974659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parallel Optimal Calibration of Mixed-Format Items for Achievement Tests.
Miller F; Fackle-Fornius E
Psychometrika; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38619664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. WITHDRAWN:Experience on radiological examinations and infection prevention for COVID-19 in radiology department.
Dinga J; Liua Y; Fub H; Gaoc J; Zhaod X; Zhenge J; Sunf W; Mag X; Fengh J; Liangc P; Wui A; Liuc J; Wangb Y; Gengj P; Chenk Y; Lil H
Radiol Infect Dis; 2020 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 32838004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods.
Kanzow AF; Schmidt D; Kanzow P
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 May; 9():e44084. PubMed ID: 37001510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introducing Summative Progress Testing in Radiology Residency: Little Change in Residents' Test Results After Transitioning from Formative Progress Testing.
Rutgers DR; van Schaik JPJ; Kruitwagen CLJJ; Haaring C; van Lankeren W; van Raamt AF; Ten Cate O
Med Sci Educ; 2020 Jun; 30(2):943-953. PubMed ID: 34457753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determinants of Difficulty and Discriminating Power of Image-based Test Items in Postgraduate Radiological Examinations.
Rutgers DR; van Raamt F; van der Gijp A; Mol C; Ten Cate O
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):665-672. PubMed ID: 29198947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of competence in volumetric image interpretation in radiology residents.
Rutgers DR; van Raamt F; Ten Cate TJ
BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):122. PubMed ID: 31046749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
