These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29199845)

  • 1. Distinct profiles of information-use characterize identity judgments in children and low-expertise adults.
    Ewing L; Karmiloff-Smith A; Farran EK; Smith ML
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1937-1943. PubMed ID: 29199845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developmental changes in the critical information used for facial expression processing.
    Ewing L; Karmiloff-Smith A; Farran EK; Smith ML
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():56-66. PubMed ID: 28554085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developmental changes in the processing of faces as revealed by EEG decoding.
    Mares I; Ewing L; Farran EK; Smith FW; Smith ML
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116660. PubMed ID: 32081784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinct information critically distinguishes judgments of face familiarity and identity.
    Smith ML; Volna B; Ewing L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1770-1779. PubMed ID: 27379874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Atypical information-use in children with autism spectrum disorder during judgments of child and adult face identity.
    Ewing L; Pellicano E; King H; Lennuyeux-Comnene L; Farran EK; Karmiloff-Smith A; Smith ML
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2018; 43(4):370-384. PubMed ID: 29558171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guess who? Facial identity discrimination training improves face memory in typically developing children.
    Bate S; Adams A; Bennetts RJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 May; 149(5):901-913. PubMed ID: 31580100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CHILDREN'S AND ADULTS' JUDGMENTS OF FACIAL TRUSTWORTHINESS: THE RELATIONSHIP TO FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS.
    Ma F; Xu F; Luo X
    Percept Mot Skills; 2015 Aug; 121(1):179-98. PubMed ID: 26108060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Greater reliance on the eye region predicts better face recognition ability.
    Royer J; Blais C; Charbonneau I; Déry K; Tardif J; Duchaine B; Gosselin F; Fiset D
    Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():12-20. PubMed ID: 30103033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's developing judgments about the physical manifestations of power.
    Terrizzi BF; Brey E; Shutts K; Beier JS
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Apr; 55(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 30589336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development in attention functions and social processing: Evidence from the Attention Network Test.
    Federico F; Marotta A; Martella D; Casagrande M
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2017 Jun; 35(2):169-185. PubMed ID: 27491798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for a young adult face bias in accuracy and consensus of age estimates.
    Short LA; Mondloch CJ; deJong J; Chan H
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Nov; 110(4):652-669. PubMed ID: 30592308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Face and body recognition show similar improvement during childhood.
    Bank S; Rhodes G; Read A; Jeffery L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Sep; 137():1-11. PubMed ID: 25909913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is typical is good: the influence of face typicality on perceived trustworthiness.
    Sofer C; Dotsch R; Wigboldus DH; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25512052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adults' Markers of Face Processing Are Present at Age 6 and Are Interconnected Along Development.
    Mardo E; Avidan G; Hadad BS
    Perception; 2018; 47(10-11):1002-1028. PubMed ID: 30217135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding Strategic Information Use During Emotional Expression Judgments in Williams Syndrome.
    Ewing L; Farran EK; Karmiloff-Smith A; Smith ML
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2017; 42(5):323-335. PubMed ID: 28891719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of spatial frequency tuning for judgments of eye gaze and facial identity.
    Vida MD; Maurer D
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():45-54. PubMed ID: 25982718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Graphical representations of adolescents' psychophysiological reactivity to social stressor tasks: Reliability and validity of the Chernoff Face approach and person-centered profiles for clinical use.
    De Los Reyes A; Aldao A; Qasmieh N; Dunn EJ; Lipton MF; Hartman C; Youngstrom EA; Dougherty LR; Lerner MD
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Apr; 29(4):422-434. PubMed ID: 27427942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact on emotion classification performance and gaze behavior of foveal versus extrafoveal processing of facial features.
    Atkinson AP; Smithson HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):292-312. PubMed ID: 32077743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Four-to-six-year-old children use norm-based coding in face-space.
    Jeffery L; McKone E; Haynes R; Firth E; Pellicano E; Rhodes G
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):18. PubMed ID: 20616134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judgments of facial attractiveness as a combination of facial parts information over time: Social and aesthetic factors.
    Saegusa C; Watanabe K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 26460871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.