These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29200881)

  • 1. Do reimbursement recommendation processes used by government drug plans in Canada adhere to good governance principles?
    Rawson NS; Adams J
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2017; 9():721-730. PubMed ID: 29200881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.
    Rawson NSB; Stewart DJ
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2024; 16():437-445. PubMed ID: 38812711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?
    Rawson NSB
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Jun; 17(1):218. PubMed ID: 35698235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Reimbursement Recommendations by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health Translate Into Coverage Decisions for Orphan Drugs in the Canadian Province of Ontario?
    Fontrier AM; Kanavos P
    Value Health; 2023 Jul; 26(7):1011-1021. PubMed ID: 36889379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health Technology Assessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Impact of CADTH Changes on Public Payer Reimbursement Recommendations.
    Binder L; Ghadban M; Sit C; Barnard K
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):1514-1526. PubMed ID: 35323327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Open Public Meetings and Elections to Promote Inward Transparency and Accountability: Lessons From Zambia.
    Vian T; Fong RM; Kaiser JL; Bwalya M; Sakanga VIR; Ngoma T; Scott NA
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Feb; 11(2):160-172. PubMed ID: 32610815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An institutional ethnographic analysis of public and patient engagement activities at a national health technology assessment agency.
    Bidonde J; Vanstone M; Schwartz L; Abelson J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2021 Feb; 37():e37. PubMed ID: 33557969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shared health governance, mutual collective accountability, and transparency in COVAX: A qualitative study triangulating data from document sampling and key informant interviews.
    Gorodensky A; Grundy Q; Persaud N; Kohler JC
    J Glob Health; 2023 Dec; 13():04165. PubMed ID: 38063440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Framework for assessing governance of the health system in developing countries: gateway to good governance.
    Siddiqi S; Masud TI; Nishtar S; Peters DH; Sabri B; Bile KM; Jama MA
    Health Policy; 2009 Apr; 90(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 18838188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of health technology assessment: best practices of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.
    Rocchi A; Chabot I; Glennie J
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2015; 7():287-98. PubMed ID: 26082654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health technology assessment of drugs for rare diseases: insights, trends, and reasons for negative recommendations from the CADTH common drug review.
    Janoudi G; Amegatse W; McIntosh B; Sehgal C; Richter T
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Dec; 11(1):164. PubMed ID: 27908281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand.
    McCormick JI; Berescu LD; Tadros N
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2018 Jan; 13(1):27. PubMed ID: 29382371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors Influencing Delays in Patient Access to New Medicines in Canada: A Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Processes in Public Drug Plans.
    Salek S; Lussier Hoskyn S; Johns JR; Allen N; Sehgal C
    Front Pharmacol; 2019; 10():196. PubMed ID: 30983993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can Standard Health Technology Assessment Approaches Help Guide the Price of Orphan Drugs in Canada? A Review of Submissions to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Common Drug Review.
    Balijepalli C; Gullapalli L; Druyts E; Yan K; Desai K; Barakat S; Locklin J
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2020; 12():445-457. PubMed ID: 32922050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health technology assessment of new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: impact of disease prevalence and cost.
    Rawson NS
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2017 Mar; 12(1):59. PubMed ID: 28330479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand.
    Stewart DJ; Bradford JP; Batist G
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):1176-1189. PubMed ID: 35200599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.