These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness? Ayton P; Fischer I Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1369-78. PubMed ID: 15900930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting Outcomes in a Sequence of Binary Events: Belief Updating and Gambler's Fallacy Reasoning. Rao K; Hastie R Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13211. PubMed ID: 36680427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regular and random judgements are not two sides of the same coin: Both representativeness and encoding play a role in randomness perception. Gronchi G; Sloman SA Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1707-1714. PubMed ID: 33959894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Losses and External Outcomes Interact to Produce the Gambler's Fallacy. Mossbridge JA; Roney CJ; Suzuki S PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170057. PubMed ID: 28125684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Heads or tails?"--a reachability bias in binary choice. Bar-Hillel M; Peer E; Acquisti A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1656-63. PubMed ID: 24773285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why are people bad at detecting randomness? A statistical argument. Williams JJ; Griffiths TL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1473-90. PubMed ID: 23607677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On producing random binary sequences. Nickerson RS; Butler SF Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 19507422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relatively random: context effects on perceived randomness and predicted outcomes. Matthews WJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1642-8. PubMed ID: 23356242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extending the two faces of subjective randomness: From the gambler's and hot-hand fallacies toward a hierarchy of binary sequence perception. Fischer I; Savranevski L Mem Cognit; 2015 Oct; 43(7):1056-70. PubMed ID: 26044942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Making heads or tails of probability: an experiment with random generators. Morsanyi K; Handley SJ; Serpell S Br J Educ Psychol; 2013 Sep; 83(Pt 3):379-95. PubMed ID: 23822527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying Heuristic Bias: Anchoring, Availability, and Representativeness. Richie M; Josephson SA Teach Learn Med; 2018; 30(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 28753383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grouping and gambling: a Gestalt approach to understanding the gambler's fallacy. Roney CJ; Trick LM Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Jun; 57(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 12822837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four. Hahn U; Warren PA Psychol Rev; 2009 Apr; 116(2):454-61. PubMed ID: 19348550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination. Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events. Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An effect of inter-trial duration on the gambler's fallacy choice bias. Militana E; Wolfson E; Cleaveland JM Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):455-9. PubMed ID: 20176090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]