BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29202879)

  • 1. The effect of prone and supine treatment positions for the pre-operative treatment of rectal cancer on organ-at-risk sparing and setup reproducibility using volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Kim A; Karotki A; Presutti J; Gonzales G; Wong S; Chu W
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Dec; 12(1):180. PubMed ID: 29202879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A treatment planning study of prone vs. supine positions for locally advanced rectal carcinoma : Comparison of 3‑dimensional conformal radiotherapy, tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Scobioala S; Kittel C; Niermann P; Wolters H; Susek KH; Haverkamp U; Eich HT
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Nov; 194(11):975-984. PubMed ID: 29855667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal Patient Positioning (Prone Versus Supine) for VMAT in Gynecologic Cancer: A Dosimetric Study on the Effect of Different Margins.
    Heijkoop ST; Westerveld H; Bijker N; Feije R; Sharfo AW; van Wieringen N; Mens JWM; Stalpers LJA; Hoogeman MS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Oct; 96(2):432-439. PubMed ID: 27598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compared planning dosimetry of TOMO, VMAT and IMRT in rectal cancer with different simulated positions.
    Lin JC; Tsai JT; Chen LJ; Li MH; Liu WH
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(26):42020-42029. PubMed ID: 28159930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
    Sawayanagi S; Yamashita H; Ogita M; Kiritoshi T; Nakamoto T; Abe O; Nakagawa K
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 13(1):70. PubMed ID: 29665832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of position and radiation technique on organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer.
    Wang JF; Li H; Xiong H; Huang H; Zou YM
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 36(5):741-746. PubMed ID: 27752904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced dose to small bowel with the prone position and a belly board versus the supine position in neoadjuvant 3D conformal radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma.
    White R; Foroudi F; Sia J; Marr MA; Lim Joon D
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2017 Jun; 64(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 27741381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
    Bayley AJ; Catton CN; Haycocks T; Kelly V; Alasti H; Bristow R; Catton P; Crook J; Gospodarowicz MK; McLean M; Milosevic M; Warde P
    Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jan; 70(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 15036850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prone Positioning on a Belly Board Decreases Rectal and Bowel Doses in Pelvic Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Prostate Cancer.
    Kószó R; Varga L; Fodor E; Kahán Z; Cserháti A; Hideghéty K; Együd Z; Szabó C; Borzási E; Szabó D; Müllner K; Varga Z; Maráz A
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2019 Jul; 25(3):995-1002. PubMed ID: 29882196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternated prone and supine whole-breast irradiation using IMRT: setup precision, respiratory movement and treatment time.
    Veldeman L; De Gersem W; Speleers B; Truyens B; Van Greveling A; Van den Broecke R; De Neve W
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):2055-64. PubMed ID: 21570208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of set up variations and bowel volumes in supine versus prone positions of patients treated with external beam radiation for carcinoma rectum.
    Rajeev KR; Menon SS; Beena K; Holla R; Kumar RR; Dinesh M
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(4):937-41. PubMed ID: 25579532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.
    Liu B; Lerma FA; Patel S; Amin P; Feng Y; Yi BY; Yu C
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18207595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximizing rectal dose sparing with hydrogel: A retrospective planning study.
    Paetkau O; Gagne IM; Pai HH; Lam J; Goulart J; Alexander A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):91-98. PubMed ID: 30889318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Small bowel protection in IMRT for rectal cancer : A dosimetric study on supine vs. prone position.
    Koeck J; Kromer K; Lohr F; Baack T; Siebenlist K; Mai S; Büttner S; Fleckenstein J; Wenz F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2017 Jul; 193(7):578-588. PubMed ID: 28220185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient positioning in prostate radiotherapy: is prone better than supine?
    Weber DC; Nouet P; Rouzaud M; Miralbell R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 May; 47(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 10802361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A dosimetric comparison of tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer with pelvic nodal radiation therapy.
    Pasquier D; Cavillon F; Lacornerie T; Touzeau C; Tresch E; Lartigau E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):549-54. PubMed ID: 22677369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of treatment position, prone or supine, on dose-volume histograms for pelvic radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.
    Drzymala M; Hawkins MA; Henrys AJ; Bedford J; Norman A; Tait DM
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 82(976):321-7. PubMed ID: 19188240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Whole breast nodal irradiation using supine VMAT and prone 3D planning: A case study.
    Coffey A; Renucci L; Hunzeker A; Lenards N
    Med Dosim; 2017 Autumn; 42(3):185-189. PubMed ID: 28579017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients.
    Frøseth TC; Strickert T; Solli KS; Salvesen Ø; Frykholm G; Reidunsdatter RJ
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 10():217. PubMed ID: 26508131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages and robustness of partial VMAT with prone position for neoadjuvant rectal cancer evaluated by CBCT-based offline adaptive radiotherapy.
    Zhang Z; Yu S; Peng F; Tan Z; Zhang L; Li D; Yang P; Peng Z; Li X; Fang C; Wang Y; Liu Y
    Radiat Oncol; 2023 Jun; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 37330508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.