These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29202971)

  • 1. Unlocking the cause of increased adverse singleton pregnancy outcomes: the role of the assisted reproductive technology derived embryo.
    Spandorfer SD
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Dec; 108(6):953-954. PubMed ID: 29202971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006.
    Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson GD; Dyer S; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1536-51. PubMed ID: 24795090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
    Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer.
    Maheshwari A; Griffiths S; Bhattacharya S
    Hum Reprod Update; 2011; 17(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 20634207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the new legislation and single-embryo transfer policy in Turkey on assisted reproduction outcomes: preliminary results.
    Kutlu P; Atvar O; Vanlioglu OF; Kutlu U; Arici A; Yilmaz S; Yilmaz E; Delikara N; Bener F; Kamar A; Alpak O; Ozekici U
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Feb; 22(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 21195669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single-embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013.
    Mersereau J; Stanhiser J; Coddington C; Jones T; Luke B; Brown MB
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):750-756. PubMed ID: 28923285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
    Jain T; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(16):1639-45. PubMed ID: 15084696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum interventions for singleton pregnancies arising from assisted reproductive technologies.
    Sun LM; Lanes A; Kingdom ; Cao H; Kramer M; Wen SW; Wu J; Chen Y; Walker MC
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Sep; 36(9):795-802. PubMed ID: 25222358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Single embryo transfer].
    De Sutter P; Delbaere I; Gerris J; Temmerman M
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2010; 72(3-4):137-47. PubMed ID: 21072957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Damaged babies from assisted reproductive technologies: focus on the BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) outcome.
    Healy D;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Mar; 81(3):512-3, discussion 526. PubMed ID: 15037392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction.
    Stillman RJ; Richter KS; Jones HW
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2599-607. PubMed ID: 23904468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention.
    Kissin DM; Kulkarni AD; Mneimneh A; Warner L; Boulet SL; Crawford S; Jamieson DJ;
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):954-61. PubMed ID: 25637480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
    Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2017 Feb; 66(6):1-24. PubMed ID: 28182605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology: both sides now.
    Cheung AP
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Apr; 51(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 16739266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.