278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29203013)
1. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.
Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The correlation between drivers' road familiarity and glance behavior using real vehicle experimental data and mathematical models.
Huang J; Hu Y; Hu L; Guo G; Gao K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 38709142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships Between Older Drivers' Cognitive Abilities as Assessed on the MoCA and Glance Patterns During Visual-Manual Radio Tuning While Driving.
Lee J; Mehler B; Reimer B; Ebe K; Coughlin JF
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2018 Sep; 73(7):1190-1197. PubMed ID: 27698013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drivers' visual behavior when using handheld and hands-free cell phones.
Fitch GM; Bartholomew PR; Hanowski RJ; Perez MA
J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():105-8. PubMed ID: 26403895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.
Tivesten E; Dozza M
J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():87-96. PubMed ID: 25934001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A spectral power analysis of driving behavior changes during the transition from nondistraction to distraction.
Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):826-831. PubMed ID: 28534644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Teens' distracted driving behavior: Prevalence and predictors.
Gershon P; Zhu C; Klauer SG; Dingus T; Simons-Morton B
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():157-161. PubMed ID: 29203014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-regulation of driving speed among distracted drivers: An application of driver behavioral adaptation theory.
Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 28095026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How safe is tuning a radio?: using the radio tuning task as a benchmark for distracted driving.
Lee JY; Lee JD; Bärgman J; Lee J; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():29-37. PubMed ID: 29101787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups.
Ortiz C; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Castro JJ; Casares-López M; Salas C
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():239-249. PubMed ID: 29723735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decisions and actions of distracted drivers at the onset of yellow lights.
Haque MM; Ohlhauser AD; Washington S; Boyle LN
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():290-299. PubMed ID: 25891775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
Gao J; Davis GA
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
Haque MM; Washington S
Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving data to assess drivers' speed choice while being engaged in different secondary tasks.
Schneidereit T; Petzoldt T; Keinath A; Krems JF
J Safety Res; 2017 Sep; 62():33-42. PubMed ID: 28882275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
