These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29203083)

  • 21. Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Roberts TR; Derry HA; Ubel PA
    J Health Commun; 2008 Mar; 13(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 18300064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Wicki B; Joeris A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 26879804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Framing of health information messages.
    Akl EA; Oxman AD; Herrin J; Vist GE; Terrenato I; Sperati F; Costiniuk C; Blank D; Schünemann H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Dec; (12):CD006777. PubMed ID: 22161408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of social media in improving knowledge among patients having fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: A single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Silwadi FM; Gill DS; Petrie A; Cunningham SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 26232831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medicine package inserts from the users' perspective: are they read and understood?
    Pizzol TDSD; Moraes CG; Arrais PSD; Bertoldi AD; Ramos LR; Farias MR; Oliveira MA; Tavares NUL; Luiza VL; Mengue SS
    Rev Bras Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 22():e190009. PubMed ID: 30892472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding.
    Damman OC; De Jong A; Hibbard JH; Timmermans DR
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Nov; 25(11):860-869. PubMed ID: 26543066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
    Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and evaluation of pictograms on medication labels for patients with limited literacy skills in a culturally diverse multiethnic population.
    Kheir N; Awaisu A; Radoui A; El Badawi A; Jean L; Dowse R
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2014; 10(5):720-30. PubMed ID: 24355379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial.
    Edwards A; Thomas R; Williams R; Ellner AL; Brown P; Elwyn G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):336-49. PubMed ID: 16860964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Competence training in evidence-based medicine for patients, patient counsellors, consumer representatives and health care professionals in Austria: a feasibility study.
    Berger B; Gerlach A; Groth S; Sladek U; Ebner K; Mühlhauser I; Steckelberg A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 23415343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence.
    Trevena LJ; Davey HM; Barratt A; Butow P; Caldwell P
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Feb; 12(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 16422776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy of Three Numerical Presentation Formats on Lay People's Comprehension and Risk Perception of Fact Boxes-A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.
    Aubertin P; Frese T; Kasper J; Mau W; Meyer G; Mikolajczyk R; Richter M; Schildmann J; Steckelberg A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "User-testing" as a method for testing the fitness-for-purpose of written medicine information.
    Raynor DK; Knapp P; Silcock J; Parkinson B; Feeney K
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):404-10. PubMed ID: 21530140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets - an exploratory survey among health care professionals.
    Mühlbauer V; Mühlhauser I
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Nov; 15():505. PubMed ID: 26554666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recruiting to Clinical Trials on the Telephone - a randomized controlled trial.
    Foss KT; Kjærgaard J; Stensballe LG; Greisen G
    Trials; 2016 Nov; 17(1):552. PubMed ID: 27871308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Age of OrthoInfo: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Patient Comprehension of Informed Consent.
    Egekeze N; Dubin J; Williams K; Bernhardt M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(19):e81. PubMed ID: 27707855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the impact of translated written discharge instructions for patients with limited English language proficiency.
    Jang M; Plocienniczak MJ; Mehrazarin K; Bala W; Wong K; Levi JR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 111():75-79. PubMed ID: 29958619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.