These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29203083)
61. Guiding principles for printed education materials: design preferences of people with aphasia. Rose TA; Worrall LE; Hickson LM; Hoffmann TC Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Feb; 14(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 22136650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Presenting self-monitoring test results for consumers: the effects of graphical formats and age. Tao D; Yuan J; Qu X J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 29762686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Do risk visualizations improve the understanding of numerical risks? A randomized, investigator-blinded general population survey. Etnel JRG; de Groot JM; El Jabri M; Mesch A; Nobel NA; Bogers AJJC; Takkenberg JJM Int J Med Inform; 2020 Mar; 135():104005. PubMed ID: 31901707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Consumer interpretation of ramipril and clopidogrel medication risk information - implications for risk communication strategies. Tong V; Raynor DK; Blalock SJ; Aslani P Patient Prefer Adherence; 2015; 9():983-8. PubMed ID: 26185427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Mental models in risk assessment: informing people about drugs. Jungermann H; Schütz H; Thüring M Risk Anal; 1988 Mar; 8(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 3375502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Saudi young patient understanding of information about side effects: Verbal versus numerical expression. Al Juffali L; Al Omran O; Al Aqeel S Saudi Pharm J; 2014 Jan; 22(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 24493971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Verbal Quantifiers and Communicating Painkiller Side Effect Risk. Cox JG Health Commun; 2020 Oct; 35(11):1349-1358. PubMed ID: 31225777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Effects of additional context information in prescription drug information sheets on comprehension and risk and efficacy perceptions. Kelly B; O'Donoghue A; Parvanta S; Boudewyns V; Oguntimein O; Bann C; West S; Tzeng J; Chandler C; Madson G; McCormack L J Pharm Policy Pract; 2022 Mar; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35232474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A systematic review of factors associated with side-effect expectations from medical interventions. Smith LE; Webster RK; Rubin GJ Health Expect; 2020 Aug; 23(4):731-758. PubMed ID: 32282119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Framing of health information messages. Akl EA; Oxman AD; Herrin J; Vist GE; Terrenato I; Sperati F; Costiniuk C; Blank D; Schünemann H Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Dec; (12):CD006777. PubMed ID: 22161408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Communicating the risk of side effects to patients: an evaluation of UK regulatory recommendations. Knapp P; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; McMillan B Drug Saf; 2009; 32(10):837-49. PubMed ID: 19722727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions. Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines. Knapp P; Raynor DK; Berry DC Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Jun; 13(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 15175486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels: A Randomized Trial. Sinayev A; Peters E; Tusler M; Fraenkel L Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):937-47. PubMed ID: 25952743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Effect of different formats for information on side effects regarding medicine users' understanding: A randomized controlled trial. Moraes CG; da Silva Dal Pizzol T Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Apr; 101(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 29203083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]