215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29203419)
1. Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis.
Page MJ; Altman DG; McKenzie JE; Shamseer L; Ahmadzai N; Wolfe D; Yazdi F; Catalá-López F; Tricco AC; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():7-18. PubMed ID: 29203419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions.
Page MJ; Altman DG; Shamseer L; McKenzie JE; Ahmadzai N; Wolfe D; Yazdi F; Catalá-López F; Tricco AC; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 94():8-18. PubMed ID: 29113936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Page MJ; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Sampson M; Tricco AC; Catalá-López F; Li L; Reid EK; Sarkis-Onofre R; Moher D
PLoS Med; 2016 May; 13(5):e1002028. PubMed ID: 27218655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
Ho L; Ke FYT; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Cheung AKL; Mao C; Chung VCH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):237. PubMed ID: 34717563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heterogeneity of studies in anesthesiology systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological review and proposal for evidence mapping.
Umberham B; Hedin R; Detweiler B; Kollmorgen L; Hicks C; Vassar M
Br J Anaesth; 2017 Nov; 119(5):874-884. PubMed ID: 29029012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
Page MJ; Moher D
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Author instructions in biomedical journals infrequently address systematic review reporting and methodology: a cross-sectional study.
Rehlicki D; Plenkovic M; Delac L; Pieper D; Marušić A; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 166():111218. PubMed ID: 37993073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interventions during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.
Medley N; Vogel JP; Care A; Alfirevic Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 11(11):CD012505. PubMed ID: 30480756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.
Katsura M; Kuriyama A; Tada M; Yamamoto K; Furukawa TA
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017411. PubMed ID: 28827269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epidemiology, methodological quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on coronavirus disease 2019: A cross-sectional study.
Chen Y; Li L; Zhang Q; Liu H; Huang Y; Lin S; Yin G; Xie Q
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Nov; 100(47):e27950. PubMed ID: 34964777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AMSTAR 2 is only partially applicable to systematic reviews of non-intervention studies: a meta-research study.
Puljak L; Bala MM; Mathes T; Poklepovic Pericic T; Wegewitz U; Faggion CM; Matthias K; Storman D; Zajac J; Rombey T; Bruschettini M; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 163():11-20. PubMed ID: 37659582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study.
Tricco AC; Tetzlaff J; Pham B; Brehaut J; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):380-386.e1. PubMed ID: 19128940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019.
Hoffmann F; Allers K; Rombey T; Helbach J; Hoffmann A; Mathes T; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():1-11. PubMed ID: 34091022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
