BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29203419)

  • 21. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study.
    Zhong CCW; Zhao J; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Mao C; Yeung JWF; Chung VCH
    Alzheimers Res Ther; 2022 Oct; 14(1):159. PubMed ID: 36309725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis on Asthma Treatments. A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Wu IXY; Deng Y; Wang H; Chen Y; Wong CHL; Chung VCH
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2020 Aug; 17(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 32383967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Study found increasing use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews and identified facilitators and barriers.
    Saldanha IJ; Hughes KL; Dodd S; Lasserson T; Kirkham JJ; Wu Y; Lucas SW; Williamson PR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 May; 169():111277. PubMed ID: 38428540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of non-Cochrane updates of systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study.
    Rombey T; Lochner V; Puljak L; Könsgen N; Mathes T; Pieper D
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):471-483. PubMed ID: 32281271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their published protocols: differences occurred frequently but were seldom explained.
    Koensgen N; Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 110():34-41. PubMed ID: 30822507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Harms reporting by systematic reviews for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Jones G; Hemmerich C; Rucker B; Wise A; Kee M; Johnson A; Brame L; Hamilton T; Vassar M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jun; 280(6):2805-2819. PubMed ID: 36595047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.
    Martinez-Monedero R; Danielian A; Angajala V; Dinalo JE; Kezirian EJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 32450783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
    Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the completeness of intervention reporting in Cochrane surgical systematic reviews using the TIDieR-SR checklist: a cross-sectional study.
    Vassar M; Page MJ; Glasbey J; Cooper C; Jorski A; Sosio J; Wayant C
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2021 Apr; 26(2):51-52. PubMed ID: 32576569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2.
    Guan X; Lao Y; Wang J; Wang Y; Bai Y; Li X; Liu S; Li Z; Li F; Dong Z
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):281. PubMed ID: 38012566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of application and interpretation errors that can occur in pairwise meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic review.
    Kanukula R; Page MJ; Turner SL; McKenzie JE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 170():111331. PubMed ID: 38552725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study.
    Krnic Martinic M; Meerpohl JJ; von Elm E; Herrle F; Marusic A; Puljak L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e029704. PubMed ID: 31471441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing journal author guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: findings from an institutional sample.
    Goldberg J; Boyce LM; Soudant C; Godwin K
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2022 Jan; 110(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 35210964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs).
    Turner L; Galipeau J; Garritty C; Manheimer E; Wieland LS; Yazdi F; Moher D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53536. PubMed ID: 23341949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic review versus structured critical analysis.
    Solow R
    Cranio; 2021 May; 39(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 31088221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery.
    Esene I; Tantengco OAG; Robertson FC; Still MEH; Ukachukwu AK; Baticulon RE; Barthélemy EJ; Perez-Chadid D; Lippa L; Silva ACV; Jokonya L; Hassani FD; Nicolosi F; Takoutsing BD; Ntalaja J; Hoz SS; Kalangu KKN; Dechambenoit G; Servadei F; El Abbadi N; Park KB; Kolias A
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2024 Jun; 166(1):250. PubMed ID: 38833024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability?
    Alabousi M; Alabousi A; McGrath TA; Cobey KD; Budhram B; Frank RA; Nguyen F; Salameh JP; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; McInnes MDF
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):517-526. PubMed ID: 30051140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characteristics and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational nutritional epidemiology: a cross-sectional study.
    Zeraatkar D; Bhasin A; Morassut RE; Churchill I; Gupta A; Lawson DO; Miroshnychenko A; Sirotich E; Aryal K; Mikhail D; Khan TA; Ha V; Sievenpiper JL; Hanna SE; Beyene J; de Souza RJ
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2021 Jun; 113(6):1578-1592. PubMed ID: 33740039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.