These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29203813)

  • 1. Comparison of single- and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Salim R; Schwartz N; Zafran N; Zuarez-Easton S; Garmi G; Romano S
    J Perinatol; 2018 Mar; 38(3):217-225. PubMed ID: 29203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
    Lajusticia H; Martínez-Domínguez SJ; Pérez-Roncero GR; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 29445926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
    Liu YR; Pu CX; Wang XY; Wang XY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 30315411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang F; Huang S; Long Y; Huang L
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jan; 44(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29271034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Salim R; Zafran N; Nachum Z; Garmi G; Kraiem N; Shalev E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 118(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21691166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outpatient cervical ripening with balloon catheters: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Aug; 166(2):607-616. PubMed ID: 38321823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Ornat L; Alonso-Ventura V; Bueno-Notivol J; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3453-3468. PubMed ID: 30741051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Double-balloon catheter compared with single-balloon catheter for induction of labor with a scarred uterus.
    Xing Y; Li N; Ji Q; Hong L; Wang X; Xing B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():139-143. PubMed ID: 31704530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review.
    Kehl S; Weiss C; Rath W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():44-50. PubMed ID: 27521597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Six versus twelve hours of single-balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lassey SC; Haber HR; Kanbergs A; Robinson JN; Little SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):611.e1-611.e8. PubMed ID: 33771496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Du YM; Zhu LY; Cui LN; Jin BH; Ou JL
    BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):891-899. PubMed ID: 27533177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outpatient versus inpatient balloon catheter insertion for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Abdelhakim AM; Shareef MA; AlAmodi AA; Aboshama RA; Fathi M; Abbas AM
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 49(8):101823. PubMed ID: 32492523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yogamoorthy U; Saaid R; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101158. PubMed ID: 37734661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical ripening balloon with and without oxytocin in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bauer AM; Lappen JR; Gecsi KS; Hackney DN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 219(3):294.e1-294.e6. PubMed ID: 29763609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double-vs single-balloon catheter for induction of labor: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Peel MD; Croll DMR; Kessler J; Haugland B; Pennell CE; Dickinson JE; Salim R; Zafran N; Palmer KR; Mol BW; Li W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Nov; 102(11):1440-1449. PubMed ID: 37417714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoen CN; Saccone G; Backley S; Sandberg EM; Gu N; Delaney S; Berghella V
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Sep; 97(9):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 29607491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 126(3):539-551. PubMed ID: 26244535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making cervical ripening EASI: a prospective controlled comparison of single versus double balloon catheters.
    Mei-Dan E; Walfisch A; Valencia C; Hallak M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1765-70. PubMed ID: 24397244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labor: a randomized trial.
    Wise MR; Thompson JMD; Battin M; McDougall J; Wilson J; Marriott J; Stitely M; Sadler L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100958. PubMed ID: 37028554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.