These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29203916)

  • 1. A model for 'sustainable' US beef production.
    Eshel G; Shepon A; Shaket T; Cotler BD; Gilutz S; Giddings D; Raymo ME; Milo R
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Jan; 2(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 29203916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical and economic implications of the adoption of novel plant-based beef substitutes in the USA: a general equilibrium modelling study.
    Mason-D'Croz D; Barnhill A; Bernstein J; Bogard J; Dennis G; Dixon P; Fanzo J; Herrero M; McLaren R; Palmer J; Rieder T; Rimmer M; Faden R
    Lancet Planet Health; 2022 Aug; 6(8):e658-e669. PubMed ID: 35932786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brazilian beef produced on pastures: sustainable and healthy.
    Lobato JF; Freitas AK; Devincenzi T; Cardoso LL; Tarouco JU; Vieira RM; Dillenburg DR; Castro I
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 25017318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
    Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
    Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: A role for beef cattle in sustainable U.S. food production1.
    Gleason CB; White RR
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):4010-4020. PubMed ID: 31414131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Small-scale integrated farming systems can abate continental-scale nutrient leakage.
    Eshel G
    PLoS Biol; 2021 Jun; 19(6):e3001264. PubMed ID: 34081691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impacts of reproductive technologies on beef production in the United States.
    Dahlen C; Larson J; Lamb GC
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 752():97-114. PubMed ID: 24170356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cattle production strategies to deliver protein with less land and lower environmental impact.
    Henn D; Duffy C; Humphreys J; Gibbons J; Byrne KA; Styles D
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 356():120569. PubMed ID: 38484594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.
    Styles D; Gonzalez-Mejia A; Moorby J; Foskolos A; Gibbons J
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 28940511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge and tools to enhance resilience of beef grazing systems for sustainable animal protein production.
    Steiner JL; Engle DM; Xiao X; Saleh A; Tomlinson P; Rice CW; Cole NA; Coleman SW; Osei E; Basara J; Middendorf G; Gowda P; Todd R; Moffet C; Anandhi A; Starks PJ; Ocshner T; Reuter R; Devlin D
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Nov; 1328():10-7. PubMed ID: 25376887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Contribution of Beef to Human Health: A Review of the Role of the Animal Production Systems.
    Pighin D; Pazos A; Chamorro V; Paschetta F; Cunzolo S; Godoy F; Messina V; Pordomingo A; Grigioni G
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2016; 2016():8681491. PubMed ID: 26989765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.
    Rotz CA; Isenberg BJ; Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5427-37. PubMed ID: 24146148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach.
    Zehetmeier M; Baudracco J; Hoffmann H; Heißenhuber A
    Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):154-66. PubMed ID: 22436163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relevance of methane emissions from beef production and the challenges of the Argentinean beef production platform.
    Rearte DH; Pordomingo AJ
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 25027797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential to curb the environmental burdens of American beef consumption using a novel plant-based beef substitute.
    Goldstein B; Moses R; Sammons N; Birkved M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189029. PubMed ID: 29211775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007.
    Capper JL
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):4249-61. PubMed ID: 21803973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmentally Optimal, Nutritionally Aware Beef Replacement Plant-Based Diets.
    Eshel G; Shepon A; Noor E; Milo R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Aug; 50(15):8164-8. PubMed ID: 27387141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methane emissions from beef cattle grazing on semi-natural upland and improved lowland grasslands.
    Richmond AS; Wylie AR; Laidlaw AS; Lively FO
    Animal; 2015 Jan; 9(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 25167210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental impacts of beef production: Review of challenges and perspectives for durability.
    Gerber PJ; Mottet A; Opio CI; Falcucci A; Teillard F
    Meat Sci; 2015 Nov; 109():2-12. PubMed ID: 26117397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.