322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29205763)
1. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical note: Evaluation and second check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Holmes J; Shen J; Shan J; Patrick CL; Wong WW; Foote RL; Patel SH; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3497-3506. PubMed ID: 35305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of monte carlo to support commissioning of the treatment planning system of new pencil beam scanning proton therapy facilities.
Botnariuc D; Court S; Lourenço A; Gosling A; Royle G; Hussein M; Rompokos V; Veiga C
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(4):. PubMed ID: 38052092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurements of in-air spot size of pencil proton beam for various air gaps in conjunction with a range shifter on a ProteusPLUS PBS dedicated machine and comparison to the proton dose calculation algorithms.
Rana S; Samuel EJJ
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):853-862. PubMed ID: 31222565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is an analytical dose engine sufficient for intensity modulated proton therapy in lung cancer?
Teoh S; Fiorini F; George B; Vallis KA; Van den Heuvel F
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190583. PubMed ID: 31696729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental benchmarking of RayStation proton dose calculation algorithms inside and outside the target region in heterogeneous phantom geometries.
Ruangchan S; Knäusl B; Fuchs H; Georg D; Clausen M
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():182-193. PubMed ID: 32693355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems.
Chang CW; Huang S; Harms J; Zhou J; Zhang R; Dhabaan A; Slopsema R; Kang M; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen K; Lin L
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1545-1557. PubMed ID: 31945191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of TPS calculation algorithms on dose delivered to the patient in proton therapy treatments.
Molinelli S; Russo S; Magro G; Maestri D; Mairani A; Mastella E; Mirandola A; Vai A; Vischioni B; Valvo F; Ciocca M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(7):075016. PubMed ID: 30802887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom.
Schreuder AN; Bridges DS; Rigsby L; Blakey M; Janson M; Hedrick SG; Wilkinson JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):127-137. PubMed ID: 31763759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commissioning of pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose engines for non-isocentric treatments in scanned proton beam therapy.
Carlino A; Böhlen T; Vatnitsky S; Grevillot L; Osorio J; Dreindl R; Palmans H; Stock M; Kragl G
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):17NT01. PubMed ID: 31342920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical Note: Clinical modeling and validation of breast tissue expander metallic ports in a commercial treatment planning system for proton therapy.
Kang Y; Shen J; Bues M; Hu Y; Liu W; Ding X
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7512-7525. PubMed ID: 34519357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of dose perturbations for metal stent in photon and proton radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lee B; Cho S; Park HC; Kang SW; Kim JS; Chung JB
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 35842636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
