These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29208077)
1. Response Time Consistency Is an Indicator of Executive Control Rather than Global Cognitive Ability. Vasquez BP; Binns MA; Anderson ND J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2018 May; 24(5):456-465. PubMed ID: 29208077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Staying on Task: Age-Related Changes in the Relationship Between Executive Functioning and Response Time Consistency. Vasquez BP; Binns MA; Anderson ND J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2016 Mar; 71(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 25395345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longitudinal Recovery of Executive Control Functions After Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Examining Trajectories of Variability and Ex-Gaussian Parameters. Vasquez BP; Tomaszczyk JC; Sharma B; Colella B; Green REA Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2018 Mar; 32(3):191-199. PubMed ID: 29561244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability of Reaction Time as a Marker of Executive Function Impairments in Fibromyalgia. Duschek S; de Guevara CML; Serrano MJF; Montoro CI; López SP; Reyes Del Paso GA Behav Neurol; 2022; 2022():1821684. PubMed ID: 35846978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Slow and steady: Training induced improvements to response time consistency are due to overall slowing and minimized extremely slow responses. Vasquez BP; Anderson ND Psychol Aging; 2018 Dec; 33(8):1181-1194. PubMed ID: 30475010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Tse CS; Balota DA; Yap MJ; Duchek JM; McCabe DP Neuropsychology; 2010 May; 24(3):300-15. PubMed ID: 20438208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Change in Cognitive Performance From Midlife Into Old Age: Findings from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study. Hughes ML; Agrigoroaei S; Jeon M; Bruzzese M; Lachman ME J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2018 Sep; 24(8):805-820. PubMed ID: 30019663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraindividual Cognitive Variability: An Examination of ANAM4 TBI-MIL Simple Reaction Time Data from Service Members with and without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Cole WR; Gregory E; Arrieux JP; Haran FJ J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2018 Feb; 24(2):156-162. PubMed ID: 29168451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reversal learning in young and middle-age neurotypicals: Individual difference reaction time considerations. Osmon DC; Leclaire KN; Driscoll I; Zolliecoffer CJ J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Nov; 42(9):902-913. PubMed ID: 33073666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aerobic Fitness and Intraindividual Reaction Time Variability in Middle and Old Age. Bauermeister S; Bunce D J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2016 May; 71(3):431-8. PubMed ID: 25352519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses. Ball BH; Brewer GA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):793-811. PubMed ID: 29239624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neurocognitive intra-individual variability in mood disorders: effects on attentional response time distributions. Gallagher P; Nilsson J; Finkelmeyer A; Goshawk M; Macritchie KA; Lloyd AJ; Thompson JM; Porter RJ; Young AH; Ferrier IN; McAllister-Williams RH; Watson S Psychol Med; 2015 Oct; 45(14):2985-97. PubMed ID: 26073667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The puzzle of processing speed, memory, and executive function impairments in schizophrenia: fitting the pieces together. Knowles EE; Weiser M; David AS; Glahn DC; Davidson M; Reichenberg A Biol Psychiatry; 2015 Dec; 78(11):786-93. PubMed ID: 25863361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Executive functioning and processing speed in age-related differences in memory: contribution of a coding task. Baudouin A; Clarys D; Vanneste S; Isingrini M Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 19796862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-individual reaction time variability based on ex-Gaussian distribution as a potential endophenotype for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Lin HY; Hwang-Gu SL; Gau SS Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Jul; 132(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 25612058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraindividual variability in inhibitory function in adults with ADHD--an ex-Gaussian approach. Gmehlin D; Fuermaier AB; Walther S; Debelak R; Rentrop M; Westermann C; Sharma A; Tucha L; Koerts J; Tucha O; Weisbrod M; Aschenbrenner S PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e112298. PubMed ID: 25479234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Working memory and intraindividual variability as neurocognitive indicators in ADHD: examining competing model predictions. Kofler MJ; Alderson RM; Raiker JS; Bolden J; Sarver DE; Rapport MD Neuropsychology; 2014 May; 28(3):459-71. PubMed ID: 24588698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing individual differences in inconsistency and plasticity as predictors of cognitive function in older adults. Grand JH; Stawski RS; MacDonald SW J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016; 38(5):534-50. PubMed ID: 26898536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ex-Gaussian analysis of simple response time as a measure of information processing speed and the relationship with brain morphometry in multiple sclerosis. Mui M; Ruben RM; Ricker TJ; Dobryakova E; Sandry J Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2022 Jul; 63():103890. PubMed ID: 35640465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]