These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study. Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The NICE UK geographic search filters for MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid): Post-development study to further evaluate precision and number-needed-to-read when retrieving UK evidence. Ayiku L; Levay P; Hudson T; Finnegan A Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):669-677. PubMed ID: 32618106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Translation and validation of PubMed and Embase search filters for identification of systematic reviews, intervention studies, and observational studies in the field of first aid. Avau B; Van Remoortel H; De Buck E J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Oct; 109(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 34858089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Database selection and data gathering methods in systematic reviews of qualitative research regarding diabetes mellitus - an explorative study. Justesen T; Freyberg J; Schultz ANØ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 33941105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall. Sampson M; Zhang L; Morrison A; Barrowman NJ; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Klassen TP; Moher D BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jul; 6():33. PubMed ID: 16848895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The medline UK filter: development and validation of a geographic search filter to retrieve research about the UK from OVID medline. Ayiku L; Levay P; Hudson T; Craven J; Barrett E; Finnegan A; Adams R Health Info Libr J; 2017 Sep; 34(3):200-216. PubMed ID: 28703418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision and recall of search strategies for identifying studies on return-to-work in Medline. Gehanno JF; Rollin L; Le Jean T; Louvel A; Darmoni S; Shaw W J Occup Rehabil; 2009 Sep; 19(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 19381789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are men difficult to find? Identifying male-specific studies in MEDLINE and Embase. Stewart F; Fraser C; Robertson C; Avenell A; Archibald D; Douglas F; Hoddinott P; van Teijlingen E; Boyers D Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; 3():78. PubMed ID: 25033713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficiency of database searches for creating systematic reviews was improved by search filters. Budhram D; Navarro-Ruan T; Haynes RB J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():1-6. PubMed ID: 29191446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Searches for randomized controlled trials of drugs in MEDLINE and EMBASE using only generic drug names compared with searches applied in current practice in systematic reviews. Waffenschmidt S; Guddat C Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 26099486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough. Boeker M; Vach W; Motschall E BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Oct; 13():131. PubMed ID: 24160679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the effectiveness of simplified search strategies for updating systematic reviews. Rice M; Ali MU; Fitzpatrick-Lewis D; Kenny M; Raina P; Sherifali D J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():148-153. PubMed ID: 28625563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Embase UK filter: validation of a geographic search filter to retrieve research about the UK from OVID Embase. Ayiku L; Levay P; Hudson T; Craven J; Finnegan A; Adams R; Barrett E Health Info Libr J; 2019 Jun; 36(2):121-133. PubMed ID: 30912233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. WHICH DATABASES SHOULD BE USED TO IDENTIFY STUDIES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS? Arber M; Glanville J; Isojarvi J; Baragula E; Edwards M; Shaw A; Wood H Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(6):547-554. PubMed ID: 30442221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precision and Recall of Search Strategies for Identifying Studies on Work-Related Psychosocial Risk Factors in PubMed. Gehanno JF; Thaon I; Pelissier C; Rollin L J Occup Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 33(4):776-784. PubMed ID: 36941513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane index most primary studies but not abstracts included in orthopedic meta-analyses. Slobogean GP; Verma A; Giustini D; Slobogean BL; Mulpuri K J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1261-7. PubMed ID: 19364634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]