These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29209832)

  • 1. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis of semiprone versus prone position.
    Seesing MFJ; Goense L; Ruurda JP; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van Hillegersberg R
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 29209832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the postural transition in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Tanishima Y; Nishikawa K; Ishikawa Y; Takahashi K; Masuda T; Kurogochi T; Yuda M; Tanaka Y; Matsumoto A; Yano F; Mitsumori N; Ikegami T
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3947-3956. PubMed ID: 34494153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thoracoscopic part of minimal invasive oesophagectomy in semiprone position: our initial experience.
    Thakkar CM; Kumar AV; Soni HN; Shah AJ; Patel KS; Haribhakti SP
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Aug; 24(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 25077636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Markar SR; Wiggins T; Antonowicz S; Zacharakis E; Hanna GB
    Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 26096374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semiprone thoracoscopic approach during totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy seems to be beneficial.
    Froiio C; Uzun E; Hadzijusufovic E; Capovilla G; Berlth F; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jan; 36(2):. PubMed ID: 35780319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Tanaka E; Okabe H; Kinjo Y; Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Sakai Y
    Surg Today; 2015 Jul; 45(7):819-25. PubMed ID: 25387656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Noshiro H; Iwasaki H; Kobayashi K; Uchiyama A; Miyasaka Y; Masatsugu T; Koike K; Miyazaki K
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):2965-73. PubMed ID: 20495981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thoracoscopic oesophageal mobilization during thoracolaparoscopy three-stage oesophagectomy: a comparison of lateral decubitus versus semiprone positions.
    Lin J; Kang M; Chen C; Lin R
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2013 Nov; 17(5):829-34. PubMed ID: 23842760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Lateral-prone Position: Experience of 226 Cases.
    Li X; Lai FC; Qiu ML; Luo RG; Lin JB; Liao B
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Feb; 26(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 26679683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
    Dapri G; Himpens J; Cadière GB
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):1060-9. PubMed ID: 18071806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of short-term outcomes between prone and lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Teshima J; Miyata G; Kamei T; Nakano T; Abe S; Katsura K; Taniyama Y; Sakurai T; Hikage M; Nakamura T; Takaya K; Zuguchi M; Okamoto H; Youhei O; Ohuchi N
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2756-62. PubMed ID: 25480621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prone position in thoracoscopic esophagectomy improves postoperative oxygenation and reduces pulmonary complications.
    Otsubo D; Nakamura T; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Kanemitsu K; Yamashita K; Imanishi T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Suzuki S; Kuroda D; Kakeji Y
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 27387180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy using prone positioning.
    Noshiro H; Miyake S
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013; 19(6):399-408. PubMed ID: 24284506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
    Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is associated with less-restrictive ventilatory impairment and less risk for pulmonary complication than open laparotomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Oshikiri T; Yasuda T; Kawasaki K; Harada H; Oyama M; Hasegawa H; Ohara T; Sendo H; Nakamura T; Fujino Y; Tominaga M; Kakeji Y
    Surgery; 2016 Feb; 159(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 26361833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.