These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29209832)

  • 21. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for esophageal cancer with the patient in prone position.
    Petri R; Zuccolo M; Brizzolari M; Rossit L; Rosignoli A; Durastante V; Petrin G; De Cecchis L; Sorrentino M
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1102-7. PubMed ID: 22042593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients.
    Palanivelu C; Prakash A; Senthilkumar R; Senthilnathan P; Parthasarathi R; Rajan PS; Venkatachlam S
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Jul; 203(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 16798482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions.
    Fabian T; Martin J; Katigbak M; McKelvey AA; Federico JA
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Nov; 22(11):2485-91. PubMed ID: 18320278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
    Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
    Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utility of thoracic cage width in assessing surgical difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy in left lateral decubitus position.
    Takeno S; Tanoue Y; Hamada R; Kawano F; Tashiro K; Wada T; Ikenoue M; Nanashima A; Nakamura K
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3479-3486. PubMed ID: 31576442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
    BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.
    Kanekiyo S; Takeda S; Tsutsui M; Nishiyama M; Kitahara M; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Tomochika S; Tokuhisa Y; Iida M; Sakamoto K; Suzuki N; Yamamoto S; Yoshino S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1945-1953. PubMed ID: 29075967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.
    Zhu ZY; Yong X; Luo RJ; Wang YZ
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 Sept.; 19(9):718-725. PubMed ID: 30178638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy in the prone versus lateral decubitus position: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schizas D; Papaconstantinou D; Krompa A; Athanasiou A; Triantafyllou T; Tsekrekos A; Ruurda JP; Rouvelas I
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Apr; 35(4):. PubMed ID: 34175947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technical and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position.
    Goldberg RF; Bowers SP; Parker M; Stauffer JA; Asbun HJ; Smith CD
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Feb; 27(2):553-7. PubMed ID: 22936434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Totally minimally invasive two-stage esophagectomy with intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis: short-term clinical and oncological outcomes.
    Elshaer M; Gravante G; Tang CB; Jayanthi NV
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Mar; 31(3):. PubMed ID: 29293970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative outcomes: role of C-reactive protein as an indicator of surgical invasiveness.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Esophagus; 2018 Apr; 15(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29892934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
    Kalff MC; Fransen LFC; de Groot EM; Gisbertz SS; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; Verhoeven RHA; Luyer MDP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e749-e757. PubMed ID: 33378310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of perioperative and oncological outcome of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in left decubitus position and in prone position for esophageal cancer.
    Kuwabara S; Kobayashi K; Kubota A; Shioi I; Yamaguchi K; Katayanagi N
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Aug; 403(5):607-614. PubMed ID: 29656329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
    Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.