These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29209942)

  • 1. The contribution of stimulus frequency and recency to set-size effects.
    van 't Wout F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1123-1128. PubMed ID: 29209942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A memory-based model of Hick's law.
    Schneider DW; Anderson JR
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 May; 62(3):193-222. PubMed ID: 21293788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hick's law for choice reaction time: A review.
    Proctor RW; Schneider DW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1281-1299. PubMed ID: 28434379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model of the uncertainty effects in choice reaction time that includes a major contribution from effector selection.
    Wright CE; Marino VF; Chubb C; Mann D
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Jul; 126(4):550-577. PubMed ID: 31081647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is it harder to switch among a larger set of tasks?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):363-76. PubMed ID: 25528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choice reaction time in pigeons fails to increase as predicted by Hick's law.
    Flaim M; Guo J; Blaisdell AP
    Behav Processes; 2023 Mar; 206():104838. PubMed ID: 36716901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voluntary task switching is affected by modality compatibility and preparation.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Poljac E; Liefooghe B; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jul; 52(5):1195-1209. PubMed ID: 38388779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-down versus bottom-up: when instructions overcome automatic retrieval.
    Waszak F; Pfister R; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2013 Sep; 77(5):611-7. PubMed ID: 23064521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different (key)strokes for different folks: How standard and nonstandard typists balance Fitts' law and Hick's law.
    Logan GD; Ulrich JE; Lindsey DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2084-2102. PubMed ID: 27748613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Race to accumulate evidence for few and many saccade alternatives: an exception to speed-accuracy trade-off.
    Puntiroli M; Tandonnet C; Kerzel D; Born S
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):507-515. PubMed ID: 27787583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A negative semantic similarity effect on short-term order memory: evidence from recency judgements.
    Tse CS
    Memory; 2010 Aug; 18(6):638-56. PubMed ID: 20687000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smaller backward crosstalk effects for free choice tasks are not the result of immediate conflict adaptation.
    Naefgen C; Janczyk M
    Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 30306368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval of bindings between task-irrelevant stimuli and responses can facilitate behaviour under conditions of high response certainty.
    Horner AJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):561-73. PubMed ID: 26085119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the scope of control underlying the congruency sequence effect: roles of stimulus-response mapping and response mode.
    Lim CE; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():267-276. PubMed ID: 30170247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exceptions to Hick's law: explorations with a response duration measure.
    Longstreth LE; el-Zahhar N; Alcorn MB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1985 Dec; 114(4):417-34. PubMed ID: 2934496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Klapp ST; Jagacinski RJ; Franks IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2005-21. PubMed ID: 25068697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual memory for pictorial stimuli in a serial choice reaction-time task.
    Marshall E; Walker P
    Br J Psychol; 1987 May; 78 ( Pt 2)():213-31. PubMed ID: 3594091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pigeon reaction time, Hick's law, and intelligence.
    Vickrey C; Neuringer A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Jun; 7(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 10909135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.