BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29210684)

  • 1. Control systems for olive mill wastewater treatment with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane in series based on the boundary flux theory.
    Ochando-Pulido JM
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):2968-2978. PubMed ID: 29210684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impacts of operating conditions on nanofiltration of secondary-treated two-phase olive mill wastewater.
    Ochando Pulido JM; Martínez Férez A
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 161():219-227. PubMed ID: 26186549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective treatment of olive mill effluents from two-phase and three-phase extraction processes by batch membranes in series operation upon threshold conditions.
    Ochando-Pulido JM; Hodaifa G; Victor-Ortega MD; Rodriguez-Vives S; Martinez-Ferez A
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 1():168-76. PubMed ID: 23602253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physicochemical analysis and adequation of olive oil mill wastewater after advanced oxidation process for reclamation by pressure-driven membrane technology.
    Ochando-Pulido JM; Victor-Ortega MD; Hodaifa G; Martinez-Ferez A
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jan; 503-504():113-21. PubMed ID: 25017639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A focus on pressure-driven membrane technology in olive mill wastewater reclamation: state of the art.
    Ochando-Pulido JM; Martinez-Ferez A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(12):2505-16. PubMed ID: 23109564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fractionation of olive mill wastewaters by membrane separation techniques.
    Cassano A; Conidi C; Giorno L; Drioli E
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Mar; 248-249():185-93. PubMed ID: 23376489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smart ultrafiltration membrane fouling control as desalination pretreatment of shale gas fracturing wastewater: The effects of backwash water.
    Chang H; Li T; Liu B; Chen C; He Q; Crittenden JC
    Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104869. PubMed ID: 31228783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
    Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of dairy wastewater by two-stage membrane operation with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration.
    Gong YW; Zhang HX; Cheng XN
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):915-9. PubMed ID: 22339027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the Flux Performance of Different RO/NF Membranes in the Treatment of Agroindustrial Wastewater by Means of the Boundary Flux Theory.
    Ochando-Pulido JM; Martínez-Férez A; Stoller M
    Membranes (Basel); 2018 Dec; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30587807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On Operating a Nanofiltration Membrane for Olive Mill Wastewater Purification at Sub- and Super-Boundary Conditions.
    Stoller M; Ochando-Pulido JM; Field R
    Membranes (Basel); 2017 Jul; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 28708120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of olive mill wastewater fractions treatment by integrated membrane process.
    Di Lecce G; Cassano A; Bendini A; Conidi C; Giorno L; Toschi TG
    J Sci Food Agric; 2014 Nov; 94(14):2935-42. PubMed ID: 24591090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Olive mill wastewater treatment in a membrane bioreactor: process stability and fouling aspects.
    Dhaouadi H; Marrot B
    Environ Technol; 2010 Jun; 31(7):761-70. PubMed ID: 20586238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
    Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
    Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of operating conditions for the valorization of olive mill wastewater using membrane processes.
    De Almeida MS; Martins RC; Quinta-Ferreira RM; Gando-Ferreira LM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(22):21968-21981. PubMed ID: 29797198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microalgal biomass production by using ultra- and nanofiltration membrane fractions of olive mill wastewater.
    Cicci A; Stoller M; Bravi M
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4710-8. PubMed ID: 23770485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review on the use of membrane technology and fouling control for olive mill wastewater treatment.
    Pulido JM
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Sep; 563-564():664-75. PubMed ID: 26472261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical feasibility study of a low-cost hybrid PAC-UF system for wastewater reclamation and reuse: a focus on feedwater production for low-pressure boilers.
    Amosa MK; Jami MS; Alkhatib MF; Majozi T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Nov; 23(22):22554-22567. PubMed ID: 27557958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oil industry wastewater treatment with fouling resistant membranes containing amphiphilic comb copolymers.
    Asatekin A; Mayes AM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4487-92. PubMed ID: 19603666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.