These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29210702)

  • 61. Evaluating an on-line cleaning agent for mitigating organic fouling in a reverse osmosis membrane.
    Park S; Hong SM; Park J; You S; Lee Y; Kim E; Cho KH
    Chemosphere; 2021 Jul; 275():130033. PubMed ID: 33676278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Treatment of biologically treated landfill leachate with forward osmosis: Investigating membrane performance and cleaning protocols.
    Ibrar I; Yadav S; Altaee A; Samal AK; Zhou JL; Nguyen TV; Ganbat N
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Nov; 744():140901. PubMed ID: 32711320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6373-9. PubMed ID: 21678956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal.
    Luo W; Phan HV; Xie M; Hai FI; Price WE; Elimelech M; Nghiem LD
    Water Res; 2017 Feb; 109():122-134. PubMed ID: 27883917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Application of forward osmosis membrane technology for oil sands process-affected water desalination.
    Jiang Y; Liang J; Liu Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(8):1809-16. PubMed ID: 27120634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Investigation of flux stability and fouling mechanism during simultaneous treatment of different produced water streams using forward osmosis and membrane distillation.
    Nawaz MS; Son HS; Jin Y; Kim Y; Soukane S; Al-Hajji MA; Abu-Ghdaib M; Ghaffour N
    Water Res; 2021 Jun; 198():117157. PubMed ID: 33933919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Influence of natural organic matter fouling and osmotic backwash on pressure retarded osmosis energy production from natural salinity gradients.
    Yip NY; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(21):12607-16. PubMed ID: 24099133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An analysis of the effects of osmotic backwashing on the seawater reverse osmosis process.
    Park J; Jeong W; Nam J; Kim J; Kim J; Chon K; Lee E; Kim H; Jang A
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(9-12):1455-61. PubMed ID: 24701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A novel concept of Vertical Up-Flow Forward Osmosis reactor: Design, performance and evaluation.
    Patel A; Mungray AK; Mungray A
    Chemosphere; 2021 Oct; 281():130741. PubMed ID: 34015655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Addressing reverse osmosis fouling within water reclamation--a side-by-side comparison of low-pressure membrane pretreatments.
    Kent FC; Farahbakhsh K
    Water Environ Res; 2011 Jun; 83(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 21751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. In situ surface chemical modification of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes for enhanced organic fouling resistance.
    Lu X; Romero-Vargas Castrillón S; Shaffer DL; Ma J; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(21):12219-28. PubMed ID: 24066902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Experimental studies and modeling on concentration polarization in forward osmosis.
    Qin JJ; Chen S; Oo MH; Kekre KA; Cornelissen ER; Ruiken CJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(11):2897-904. PubMed ID: 20489263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Treatment of the methanogenic landfill leachate with thin open channel reverse osmosis membrane modules.
    Li F; Wichmann K; Heine W
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):960-4. PubMed ID: 18693005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
    Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A green, hybrid cleaning strategy for the mitigation of biofouling deposition in the elevated salinity forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FOMBR) operation.
    Ab Hamid NH; Wang DK; Smart S; Ye L
    Chemosphere; 2022 Feb; 288(Pt 3):132612. PubMed ID: 34678348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly.
    Saren Q; Qiu CQ; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(12):5201-8. PubMed ID: 21591607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Investigations of inorganic and organic fouling behaviors, antifouling and cleaning strategies for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) membrane using seawater desalination brine and wastewater.
    Han G; Zhou J; Wan C; Yang T; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2016 Oct; 103():264-275. PubMed ID: 27470469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A new class of draw solutions for minimizing reverse salt flux to improve forward osmosis desalination.
    Nguyen HT; Nguyen NC; Chen SS; Ngo HH; Guo W; Li CW
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 538():129-36. PubMed ID: 26298255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.