These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29211150)

  • 21. Spatial Errors in Automated Geocoding of Incident Locations in Australian Suicide Mortality Data.
    Torok M; Konings P; Passioura J; Chen NA; Hewett M; Phillips M; Burnett A; Shand F; Christensen H
    Epidemiology; 2021 Nov; 32(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 34310446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An analysis of the process and results of manual geocode correction.
    McDonald YJ; Schwind M; Goldberg DW; Lampley A; Wheeler CM
    Geospat Health; 2017 May; 12(1):526. PubMed ID: 28555477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Geographical information system (GIS) modeling territory receptivity to strengthen entomological surveillance: Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) case study in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.
    Albuquerque HG; Peiter PC; Toledo LM; Alencar JAF; Sabroza PC; Dias CG; Santos JPC; Suárez-Mutis MC
    Parasit Vectors; 2018 Apr; 11(1):256. PubMed ID: 29673392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding.
    Ward MH; Nuckols JR; Giglierano J; Bonner MR; Wolter C; Airola M; Mix W; Colt JS; Hartge P
    Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 15951673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving geocoding practices: evaluation of geocoding tools.
    Yang DH; Bilaver LM; Hayes O; Goerge R
    J Med Syst; 2004 Aug; 28(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15366241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Geocoding addresses from a large population-based study: lessons learned.
    McElroy JA; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert SA; Newcomb PA
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12843762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
    Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
    Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improved Geocoding of Cancer Registry Addresses in Urban and Rural Oklahoma.
    Dilekli N; Janitz A; Campbell J
    J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 32833379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Geocoding cryptosporidiosis cases in Ireland (2008-2017)-development of a reliable, reproducible, multiphase geocoding methodology.
    Domegan L; Garvey P; McKeown P; Johnson H; Hynds P; O'Dwyer J; ÓhAiseadha C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2021 Nov; 190(4):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 33464478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Socio-Environmental Vulnerability Index: An Application to Rio de Janeiro-Brazil.
    Malta FS; Marques da Costa E
    Int J Public Health; 2021; 66():584308. PubMed ID: 34744556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state.
    Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inequalities in HAART uptake and differential survival according to exposure category in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Lima TA; Beyrer C; Golub JE; Mota JCD; Malta MS; Silva CMFPD; Bastos FI
    Cad Saude Publica; 2018 Aug; 34(8):e00009617. PubMed ID: 30133651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characterizing the neighborhood risk environment in multisite clinic-based cohort studies: A practical geocoding and data linkages protocol for protected health information.
    Nassel A; Wilson-Barthes MG; Howe CJ; Napravnik S; Mugavero MJ; Agil D; Dulin AJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278672. PubMed ID: 36580446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Geocoding health data with Geographic Information Systems: a pilot study in northeast Italy for developing a standardized data-acquiring format.
    Baldovin T; Zangrando D; Casale P; Ferrarese F; Bertoncello C; Buja A; Marcolongo A; Baldo V
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2015 Aug; 56(2):E88-94. PubMed ID: 26789994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A multifaceted comparison of ArcGIS and MapMarker for automated geocoding.
    Kumar S; Liu M; Hwang SA
    Geospat Health; 2012 Nov; 7(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 23242688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decentralized and reproducible geocoding and characterization of community and environmental exposures for multisite studies.
    Brokamp C; Wolfe C; Lingren T; Harley J; Ryan P
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Mar; 25(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 29126118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improving geocoding outcomes for the Nebraska Cancer Registry: learning from proven practices.
    Lin G; Gray J; Qu M
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 21086822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A high spatial resolution outdoor dose rate map of the Rio de Janeiro city, Brasil, risk assessment and urbanization effects.
    Licínio MV; Freitas AC; Evangelista H; Costa-Gonçalves A; Miranda M; Alencar AS
    J Environ Radioact; 2013 Dec; 126():32-9. PubMed ID: 23933084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of Geographical Information System (GIS) to improve active leprosy case finding campaigns in the municipality of Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.
    De Souza Dias MC; Dias GH; Nobre ML
    Lepr Rev; 2007 Sep; 78(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 18035777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigating impacts of positional error on potential health care accessibility.
    Bell S; Wilson K; Shah TI; Gersher S; Elliott T
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 22469488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.