These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 292140)

  • 21. Near-threshold equal-loudness contours for harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) derived from reaction times during underwater audiometry: a preliminary study.
    Kastelein RA; Wensveen PJ; Terhune JM; de Jong CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):488-95. PubMed ID: 21303029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relationship between aided preferred listening level and long-term listening range.
    Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 6724174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of a severely reduced dynamic range of hearing on the perception of speech.
    Villchur E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):131-40. PubMed ID: 292139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Mar; 49(3):216-27. PubMed ID: 20151930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of acclimatization and deprivation on non-speech auditory abilities.
    Byrne D; Dirks D
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3 Suppl):29S-37S. PubMed ID: 8807274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of hearing threshold level and most comfortable loudness level in hearing aid prescription.
    Berger KW; Hagberg EN; Varavvas DM; Vottero DM
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 7060843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preferred listening levels for bands of speech in relation to hearing aid selection.
    Christen R; Byrne D
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7444317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Aided loudness growth and satisfaction with everyday loudness perception in compression hearing aid users.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA; Zwislockit JJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Mar; 18(3):206-19. PubMed ID: 17479614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Test-retest reliability of a forced-choice procedure for determining most comfortable loudness level for speech.
    Wall LG; Gans RE
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 6724172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Loudness scaling revisited.
    Elberling C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 May; 10(5):248-60. PubMed ID: 10331617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. IHAFF loudness contour test: reliability and effects of approach mode in normal-hearing subjects.
    Beattie RC; Huynh RC; Ngo VN; Jones RL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Aug; 8(4):243-56. PubMed ID: 9272746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recent advances in hearing aid selection and adjustment.
    Skinner MW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1984; 93(6 Pt 1):569-75. PubMed ID: 6508129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Most comfortable listening for the loudness and intelligibility of speech.
    Hochberg I
    Audiology; 1975; 14(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1147843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Loudness perception in the domestic cat: reaction time estimates of equal loudness contours and recruitment effects.
    May BJ; Little N; Saylor S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 10(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 19198944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationship between loudness tolerance and the acceptance of background noise for young adults with normal hearing.
    Franklin CA; White LJ; Franklin TC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Jun; 114(3):717-22. PubMed ID: 22913014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationships between comfortable loudness levels for speech and speech discrimination in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Posner J; Ventry IM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1977 Aug; 42(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 881819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.
    Scollie S; Seewald R; Cornelisse L; Moodie S; Bagatto M; Laurnagaray D; Beaulac S; Pumford J
    Trends Amplif; 2005; 9(4):159-97. PubMed ID: 16424945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Loudness and satisfaction ratings for hearing aid users.
    Blamey PJ; Martin LF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Apr; 20(4):272-82. PubMed ID: 19927699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Loudness discomfort levels and saturation levels in hearing aids prescribed for young persons.
    Israelsson B; Sandh A; Leijon A
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 8750755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A computer program for fitting a master hearing aid to the residual hearing characteristics of individual patients.
    Engebretson AM; Miller JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Aug; 72(2):426-30. PubMed ID: 7119285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.