These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2921419)

  • 1. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.
    Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Martin CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):365-78. PubMed ID: 2921419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.
    McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.
    Hazan V; Markham D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3108-18. PubMed ID: 15603156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. I. Effects of variability in speaking rate and overall amplitude.
    Sommers MS; Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1314-24. PubMed ID: 7962998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition.
    Clopper CG; Pisoni DB; Tierney AT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 May; 17(5):331-49. PubMed ID: 16796300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus variability and the phonetic relevance hypothesis: effects of variability in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on spoken word identification.
    Sommers MS; Barcroft J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2406-16. PubMed ID: 16642853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.
    Choi JY; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103982. PubMed ID: 31229740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Talker-specific influences on phonetic category structure.
    Theodore RM; Myers EB; Lomibao JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):1068-78. PubMed ID: 26328722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception.
    Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 2345691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.
    Theodore RM; Monto NR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functionally integrated neural processing of linguistic and talker information: An event-related fMRI and ERP study.
    Zhang C; Pugh KR; Mencl WE; Molfese PJ; Frost SJ; Magnuson JS; Peng G; Wang WS
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):536-549. PubMed ID: 26343322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual learning of phonetic information that indicates morphological structure.
    Barden K; Hawkins S
    Phonetica; 2013; 70(4):323-42. PubMed ID: 24514161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.
    Clopper CG; Pisoni DB
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 3):207-39. PubMed ID: 15697151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple sources of acoustic variation affect speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Tin JAA; Perrachione TK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):209. PubMed ID: 36732274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.