These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29214231)

  • 1. Ab initio chemical safety assessment: A workflow based on exposure considerations and non-animal methods.
    Berggren E; White A; Ouedraogo G; Paini A; Richarz AN; Bois FY; Exner T; Leite S; Grunsven LAV; Worth A; Mahony C
    Comput Toxicol; 2017 Nov; 4():31-44. PubMed ID: 29214231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Next generation risk assessment: an
    Ebmeyer J; Najjar A; Lange D; Boettcher M; Voß S; Brandmair K; Meinhardt J; Kuehnl J; Hewitt NJ; Krueger CT; Schepky A
    Front Pharmacol; 2024; 15():1345992. PubMed ID: 38515841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A workflow to practically apply true dose considerations to in vitro testing for next generation risk assessment.
    Nicol B; Vandenbossche-Goddard E; Thorpe C; Newman R; Patel H; Yates D
    Toxicology; 2024 Jun; 505():153826. PubMed ID: 38719068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. COSMOS next generation - A public knowledge base leveraging chemical and biological data to support the regulatory assessment of chemicals.
    Yang C; Cronin MTD; Arvidson KB; Bienfait B; Enoch SJ; Heldreth B; Hobocienski B; Muldoon-Jacobs K; Lan Y; Madden JC; Magdziarz T; Marusczyk J; Mostrag A; Nelms M; Neagu D; Przybylak K; Rathman JF; Park J; Richarz AN; Richard AM; Ribeiro JV; Sacher O; Schwab C; Vitcheva V; Volarath P; Worth AP
    Comput Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 19():100175. PubMed ID: 34405124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project.
    Escher SE; Kamp H; Bennekou SH; Bitsch A; Fisher C; Graepel R; Hengstler JG; Herzler M; Knight D; Leist M; Norinder U; Ouédraogo G; Pastor M; Stuard S; White A; Zdrazil B; van de Water B; Kroese D
    Arch Toxicol; 2019 Dec; 93(12):3643-3667. PubMed ID: 31781791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a next generation risk assessment framework for the evaluation of skin sensitisation of cosmetic ingredients.
    Gilmour N; Kern PS; Alépée N; Boislève F; Bury D; Clouet E; Hirota M; Hoffmann S; Kühnl J; Lalko JF; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Nishida H; Osmani A; Petersohn D; Sekine S; van Vliet E; Klaric M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Oct; 116():104721. PubMed ID: 32645429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The SEURAT-1 approach towards animal free human safety assessment.
    Gocht T; Berggren E; Ahr HJ; Cotgreave I; Cronin MT; Daston G; Hardy B; Heinzle E; Hescheler J; Knight DJ; Mahony C; Peschanski M; Schwarz M; Thomas RS; Verfaillie C; White A; Whelan M
    ALTEX; 2015; 32(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 25372315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From vision toward best practices: Evaluating
    Reardon AJF; Farmahin R; Williams A; Meier MJ; Addicks GC; Yauk CL; Matteo G; Atlas E; Harrill J; Everett LJ; Shah I; Judson R; Ramaiahgari S; Ferguson SS; Barton-Maclaren TS
    Front Toxicol; 2023; 5():1194895. PubMed ID: 37288009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are Non-animal Systemic Safety Assessments Protective? A Toolbox and Workflow.
    Middleton AM; Reynolds J; Cable S; Baltazar MT; Li H; Bevan S; Carmichael PL; Dent MP; Hatherell S; Houghton J; Kukic P; Liddell M; Malcomber S; Nicol B; Park B; Patel H; Scott S; Sparham C; Walker P; White A
    Toxicol Sci; 2022 Aug; 189(1):124-147. PubMed ID: 35822611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of the "threshold of toxicological concern" to derive tolerable concentrations of "non-relevant metabolites" formed from plant protection products in ground and drinking water.
    Melching-Kollmuss S; Dekant W; Kalberlah F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 19766683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is a pragmatic tool for the safety assessment: Case studies of cosmetic ingredients with low consumer exposure.
    Bury D; Head J; Keller D; Klaric M; Rose J;
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104964. PubMed ID: 34023455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A strategy for systemic toxicity assessment based on non-animal approaches: The Cosmetics Europe Long Range Science Strategy programme.
    Desprez B; Dent M; Keller D; Klaric M; Ouédraogo G; Cubberley R; Duplan H; Eilstein J; Ellison C; Grégoire S; Hewitt NJ; Jacques-Jamin C; Lange D; Roe A; Rothe H; Blaauboer BJ; Schepky A; Mahony C
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Aug; 50():137-146. PubMed ID: 29499337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Next-generation risk assessment read-across case study: application of a 10-step framework to derive a safe concentration of daidzein in a body lotion.
    Najjar A; Kühnl J; Lange D; Géniès C; Jacques C; Fabian E; Zifle A; Hewitt NJ; Schepky A
    Front Pharmacol; 2024; 15():1421601. PubMed ID: 38962304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chemical Safety Assessment Using Read-Across: Assessing the Use of Novel Testing Methods to Strengthen the Evidence Base for Decision Making.
    Berggren E; Amcoff P; Benigni R; Blackburn K; Carney E; Cronin M; Deluyker H; Gautier F; Judson RS; Kass GE; Keller D; Knight D; Lilienblum W; Mahony C; Rusyn I; Schultz T; Schwarz M; Schüürmann G; White A; Burton J; Lostia AM; Munn S; Worth A
    Environ Health Perspect; 2015 Dec; 123(12):1232-40. PubMed ID: 25956009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utilizing relative potency factors (RPF) and threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concepts to assess hazard and human risk assessment profiles of environmental metabolites: a case study.
    Terry C; Rasoulpour RJ; Knowles S; Billington R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 25584438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bolstering the existing database supporting the non-cancer Threshold of Toxicological Concern values with toxicity data on fragrance-related materials.
    Patel A; Joshi K; Rose J; Laufersweiler M; Felter SP; Api AM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Oct; 116():104718. PubMed ID: 32603678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SpheraCosmolife: a new tool for the risk assessment of cosmetic products.
    Selvestrel G; Robino F; Baderna D; Manganelli S; Asturiol D; Manganaro A; Zanotti Russo M; Lavado G; Toma C; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
    ALTEX; 2021; 38(4):565-579. PubMed ID: 33963416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Safety of Cosmetic Ingredients and Their Skin Compatibility through In Silico and In Vivo Assessments of a Newly Developed Eye Serum.
    Juncan AM; Rus LL; Morgovan C; Loghin F
    Toxics; 2024 Jun; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 39058103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.