These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29214231)

  • 21. Amended final report on the safety assessment of glyceryl dilaurate, glyceryl diarachidate, glyceryl dibehenate, glyceryl dierucate, glyceryl dihydroxystearate, glyceryl diisopalmitate, glyceryl diisostearate, glyceryl dilinoleate, glyceryl dimyristate, glyceryl dioleate, glyceryl diricinoleate, glyceryl dipalmitate, glyceryl dipalmitoleate, glyceryl distearate, glyceryl palmitate lactate, glyceryl stearate citrate, glyceryl stearate lactate, and glyceryl stearate succinate.
    Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 3():1-30. PubMed ID: 18273450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening of repeated dose toxicity data present in SCC(NF)P/SCCS safety evaluations of cosmetic ingredients.
    Vinken M; Pauwels M; Ates G; Vivier M; Vanhaecke T; Rogiers V
    Arch Toxicol; 2012 Mar; 86(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 22038139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity: Report from an EPAA Blue Sky Workshop.
    Mahony C; Ashton RS; Birk B; Boobis AR; Cull T; Daston GP; Ewart L; Knudsen TB; Manou I; Maurer-Stroh S; Margiotta-Casaluci L; Müller BP; Nordlund P; Roberts RA; Steger-Hartmann T; Vandenbossche E; Viant MR; Vinken M; Whelan M; Zvonimir Z; Cronin MTD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Jul; 114():104668. PubMed ID: 32335207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients.
    Nohynek GJ; Antignac E; Re T; Toutain H
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):239-59. PubMed ID: 20005888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implementing Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (TT21C): Making safety decisions using toxicity pathways, and progress in a prototype risk assessment.
    Adeleye Y; Andersen M; Clewell R; Davies M; Dent M; Edwards S; Fowler P; Malcomber S; Nicol B; Scott A; Scott S; Sun B; Westmoreland C; White A; Zhang Q; Carmichael PL
    Toxicology; 2015 Jun; 332():102-11. PubMed ID: 24582757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developing an internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC).
    Arnot JA; Toose L; Armitage JM; Sangion A; Looky A; Brown TN; Li L; Becker RA
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):877-884. PubMed ID: 36347933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Application of physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling in the next generation risk assessment of dermally applied consumer products.
    Moxon TE; Li H; Lee MY; Piechota P; Nicol B; Pickles J; Pendlington R; Sorrell I; Baltazar MT
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Mar; 63():104746. PubMed ID: 31837441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Final report of the safety assessment of Alcohol Denat., including SD Alcohol 3-A, SD Alcohol 30, SD Alcohol 39, SD Alcohol 39-B, SD Alcohol 39-C, SD Alcohol 40, SD Alcohol 40-B, and SD Alcohol 40-C, and the denaturants, Quassin, Brucine Sulfate/Brucine, and Denatonium Benzoate.
    Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel
    Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 1():1-43. PubMed ID: 18569160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiscale modelling approaches for assessing cosmetic ingredients safety.
    Bois FY; Ochoa JGD; Gajewska M; Kovarich S; Mauch K; Paini A; Péry A; Benito JVS; Teng S; Worth A
    Toxicology; 2017 Dec; 392():130-139. PubMed ID: 27267299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New Toxicology Tools and the Emerging Paradigm Shift in Environmental Health Decision-Making.
    Ginsberg GL; Pullen Fedinick K; Solomon GM; Elliott KC; Vandenberg JJ; Barone S; Bucher JR
    Environ Health Perspect; 2019 Dec; 127(12):125002. PubMed ID: 31834829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sourcing data on chemical properties and hazard data from the US-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard: A practical guide for human risk assessment.
    Williams AJ; Lambert JC; Thayer K; Dorne JCM
    Environ Int; 2021 Sep; 154():106566. PubMed ID: 33934018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Toxicity assessment strategies, data requirements, and risk assessment approaches to derive health based guidance values for non-relevant metabolites of plant protection products.
    Dekant W; Melching-Kollmuss S; Kalberlah F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19883711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A 10-step framework for use of read-across (RAX) in next generation risk assessment (NGRA) for cosmetics safety assessment.
    Alexander-White C; Bury D; Cronin M; Dent M; Hack E; Hewitt NJ; Kenna G; Naciff J; Ouedraogo G; Schepky A; Mahony C; Europe C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Mar; 129():105094. PubMed ID: 34990780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. It is time to develop ecological thresholds of toxicological concern to assist environmental hazard assessment.
    Belanger SE; Sanderson H; Embry MR; Coady K; DeZwart D; Farr BA; Gutsell S; Halder M; Sternberg R; Wilson P
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2864-9. PubMed ID: 26111584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients.
    Kroes R; Renwick AG; Feron V; Galli CL; Gibney M; Greim H; Guy RH; Lhuguenot JC; van de Sandt JJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Dec; 45(12):2533-62. PubMed ID: 17664037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a read-across workflow for skin irritation and corrosion predictions.
    Abe A; Sezaki T; Kinoshita K
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 30(4):279-298. PubMed ID: 31012352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health related guide values for drinking-water since 1993 as guidance to assess presence of new analytes in drinking-water.
    Dieter HH
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2014 Mar; 217(2-3):117-32. PubMed ID: 23820379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Insights on in vitro models for safety and toxicity assessment of cosmetic ingredients.
    Almeida A; Sarmento B; Rodrigues F
    Int J Pharm; 2017 Mar; 519(1-2):178-185. PubMed ID: 28104405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.