These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2921432)

  • 1. Effect of finishing on the in vivo wear rate of a posterior composite resin.
    Ratanapridakul K; Leinfelder KF; Thomas J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Mar; 118(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 2921432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins.
    Dickinson GL; Leinfelder KF; Mazer RB; Russell CM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Aug; 121(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 2144862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: a 4-year follow-up study.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):603-6. PubMed ID: 3225375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations.
    Morgan M
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 16(3):211-7; quiz 218. PubMed ID: 15199696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of optical standards for determining wear of posterior composite resins.
    Gerbo L; Leinfelder KF; Mueninghoff L; Russell C
    J Esthet Dent; 1990; 2(5):148-52. PubMed ID: 2151725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo occlusal wear of posterior composite restorations.
    Lewis G
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 1803330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 7803009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of incremental versus bulk fill technique on resistance to cuspal fracture of teeth restored with posterior composites.
    Wieczkowski G; Joynt RB; Klockowski R; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Sep; 60(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 3172014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo evaluation of the wear of restorative resin.
    Mitchem JC; Gronas DG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1982 Mar; 104(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 6949979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year findings.
    Vann WF; Barkmeier WW; Mahler DB
    J Dent Res; 1988 May; 67(5):876-9. PubMed ID: 2966821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites.
    Marghalani HY
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 20433565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
    Barnes DM; Blank LW; Thompson VP; Holston AM; Gingell JC
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2068249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Composite restorations for primary molars: results after four years.
    Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC
    Pediatr Dent; 1987 Jun; 9(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 3475683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vivo experiment to test composite resin wear using the Latin-Square analysis.
    Lang BR; Bloem TJ; Wang RF; Jaarda M; Kowalski CJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(6):529-38. PubMed ID: 1817524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A quantitative study of finishing and polishing techniques for a composite.
    Chen RC; Chan DC; Chan KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Mar; 59(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 2964525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulus of resilience as predictor for clinical wear of restorative resins.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Dent Mater; 1992 May; 8(3):146-8. PubMed ID: 1387854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subsurface damage layer of in vivo worn dental composite restorations.
    Wu W; Toth EE; Moffa JF; Ellison JA
    J Dent Res; 1984 May; 63(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 6200522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of surface roughness of composite fillings.
    Sutalo J; Azinović Z; Tuda M; Ciglar I
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1988; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2978001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.