These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 292146)

  • 1. Multichannel compression hearing aids: experiments and consideration on clinical applicability.
    Barfod J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):315-40. PubMed ID: 292146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech enhancement by filtering in the loudness domain.
    Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():207-14. PubMed ID: 2356729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Programmable hearing aid with multichannel compression.
    Mangold S; Leijon A
    Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 515689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and evaluation of a two-channel compression hearing aid.
    Moore BC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):181-92. PubMed ID: 3430376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of signal processing on intelligibility of speech in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Yanick P
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(5):229-38. PubMed ID: 956011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of attack time and release time on speech intelligibility. A study of the effects of AGC on normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects.
    Jerlvall LB; Lindblad AC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):341-53. PubMed ID: 292147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
    Plomp R
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for the evaluation of hearing aids.
    Levitt H
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):199-240. PubMed ID: 292143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multifocal amplification, a decisive step in recruitment compensation.
    Olsen J; Ahlbom C
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1993; 114(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 8059105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considerations on adaptive gain and frequency response in hearing aids.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():196-201. PubMed ID: 2356727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.