BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29214682)

  • 1. Attentional asymmetry between visual hemifields is related to habitual direction of reading and its implications for debate on cause and effects of dyslexia.
    Kermani M; Verghese A; Vidyasagar TR
    Dyslexia; 2018 Feb; 24(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 29214682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of script direction on word processing modes in left and right visual fields.
    Siéroff E; Slama Y
    Laterality; 2018 Jul; 23(4):479-500. PubMed ID: 29141494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading direction shifts visuospatial attention: an Interactive Account of attentional biases.
    Rinaldi L; Di Luca S; Henik A; Girelli L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():98-105. PubMed ID: 24968311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental script affects lateral asymmetry of word recognition: A study of French-Hebrew bilinguals tested in Israel and in France.
    Siéroff E; Haehnel-Benoliel N
    Laterality; 2015; 20(4):389-417. PubMed ID: 25496428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orienting of visual attention in dyslexia: evidence for asymmetric hemispheric control of attention.
    Facoetti A; Turatto M; Lorusso ML; Mascetti GG
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 May; 138(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 11374082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual laterality effects in readers of a deep and a shallow orthography.
    Beaton AA; Suller S; Workman L
    Laterality; 2007 May; 12(3):199-215. PubMed ID: 17454571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanisms of attention in reading parafoveal words: a cross-linguistic study in children.
    Siéroff E; Dahmen R; Fagard J
    Neuropsychology; 2012 May; 26(3):334-46. PubMed ID: 22563874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli.
    Nachshon I
    Int J Neurosci; 1985 Jan; 25(3-4):161-74. PubMed ID: 3884523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetric bias in perception of facial affect among Roman and Arabic script readers.
    Heath RL; Rouhana A; Ghanem DA
    Laterality; 2005 Jan; 10(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 15841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading direction influences lateral biases in letter processing.
    Ransley K; Goodbourn PT; Nguyen EHL; Moustafa AA; Holcombe AO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1678-1686. PubMed ID: 29698039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bisections in two languages: when number processing, spatial representation, and habitual reading direction interact.
    Kazandjian S; Cavézian C; Zivotofsky AZ; Chokron S
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4031-7. PubMed ID: 20965204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphology, orthography, and the two hemispheres: A divided visual field study with Hindi/Urdu biliterates.
    Rao C; Vaid J
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():46-55. PubMed ID: 27461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia.
    Stein J
    Dyslexia; 2001; 7(1):12-36. PubMed ID: 11305228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetrical visual fields distribution of attention in dyslexic children: a neuropsychological study.
    Facoetti A; Turatto M
    Neurosci Lett; 2000 Sep; 290(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 10963902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absence of right visual field attentional bias in reading in dyslexic children.
    Bricout-Tomasi L; Billard C; Siéroff E
    Behav Neurol; 2010; 23(4):189-91. PubMed ID: 21422551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Native reading direction influences lateral biases in the perception of shape from shading.
    Smith AK; Szelest I; Friedrich TE; Elias LJ
    Laterality; 2015; 20(4):418-33. PubMed ID: 25537526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word and line bisection in typical and impaired readers and a cross-language comparison.
    Gabay Y; Gabay S; Henik A; Schiff R; Behrmann M
    Brain Lang; 2015 Nov; 150():143-52. PubMed ID: 26457923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dorsal stream deficits suggest hidden dyslexia among deaf poor readers: correlated evidence from reduced perceptual speed and elevated coherent motion detection thresholds.
    Samar VJ; Parasnis I
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):300-11. PubMed ID: 15963380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two different readers in the same brain after a posterior callosal lesion.
    Michel F; Hénaff MA; Intriligator J
    Neuroreport; 1996 Feb; 7(3):786-8. PubMed ID: 8733745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.