These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29214896)
1. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing. Neben N; Buechner A; Schuessler M; Lenarz T Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 29214896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor. Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users. Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. Kerber S; Seeber BU Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor. Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits in noise from sound processor upgrade in thirty-three cochlear implant users for more than 20 years. Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Nguyen Y; Lahlou G Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 278(3):827-831. PubMed ID: 32588171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) with the Naída CI Q90 sound processor in experienced cochlear implant users. Battmer RD; Scholz S; Geissler G; Ernst A Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):331-340. PubMed ID: 31464168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation. Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report. Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A real-world evaluation of the clinical benefits of improved sound processor technology among Chinese cochlear implant users: A focus on Cochlear Nucleus 7. Deng X; Wu C; Wu L; Lu J; Zhang J PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0307044. PubMed ID: 39226302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system. Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of input processing and type of personal frequency modulation system on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants. Wolfe J; Schafer E; Parkinson A; John A; Hudson M; Wheeler J; Mucci A Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 22941405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor. De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Vanpoucke F; Govaerts PJ Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):837-843. PubMed ID: 28695749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controlled comparative clinical trial of hearing benefit outcomes for users of the Cochlear™ Nucleus Warren CD; Nel E; Boyd PJ Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):116-126. PubMed ID: 30714500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]