These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29215806)
1. Development of an LCD-Based Visual Field System. Joo JH; Lee J; You H; Kang J J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 33(3):e19. PubMed ID: 29215806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma. Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic ability of Humphrey perimetry, Octopus perimetry, and optical coherence tomography for glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Monsalve B; Ferreras A; Calvo P; Urcola JA; Figus M; Monsalve J; Frezzotti P Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 27834960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma]. Kampmeier J; Eisert B; Buchwald HJ; Lang GK; Lang GE Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study. Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Bowden S; Shi RB; Li Y; Ahmed IIK; Arshinoff SA Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer. Kang J; De Arrigunaga S; Freeman SE; Zhao Y; Lin M; Liebman DL; Roldan AM; Kim JA; Chang DS; Friedman DS; Elze T Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma. Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flicker defined form, standard perimetry and Heidelberg retinal tomography: Structure-function relationships. Ichhpujani P; Lo DC; Cvintal V; Waisbourd M; Averbuch A; Leiby BE; Myers JS; Spaeth GL; Katz LJ Can J Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 50(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 26257223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss. Goukon H; Hirasawa K; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224711. PubMed ID: 31697732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study. Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Compass and Humphrey perimeters in detecting glaucomatous defects. Fogagnolo P; Modarelli A; Oddone F; Digiuni M; Montesano G; Orzalesi N; Rossetti L Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 26(6):598-606. PubMed ID: 27375066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT. Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying "preperimetric" glaucoma in standard automated perimetry visual fields. Asaoka R; Iwase A; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Araie M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 55(12):7814-20. PubMed ID: 25342615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retinal Sensitivity Thresholds Obtained Through Easyfield and Humphrey Perimeters in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. Nazareth T; Rocha J; Scoralick ALB; Dias DT; Gracitelli CPB; Kanadani FN; Prata TS Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():4201-4207. PubMed ID: 33299296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma. Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17389740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters. Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jun; 87(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 12770962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]