183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29216797)
1. Mandibular condylar dimensions: Correlation between 3D tomography and dried skull measurements.
Scariot R; Gonsar B; Gill N; Furquim F; Corso PFCL; Trevillato PC; Potluri A; Vieira AR
Cranio; 2019 May; 37(3):153-158. PubMed ID: 29216797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional and Positional Associations between the Mandibular Condyle and Glenoid Fossa: A Three-dimensional Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based Study.
Almashraqi AA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Oct; 21(10):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 33686026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and Reliability of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Condyle Measurements. A Human Cadaver Study.
García-Sanz V; Bellot-Arcís C; Hernández V; Serrano-Sánchez P; Guarinos J; Paredes-Gallardo V
Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11993. PubMed ID: 28931867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TMJ arthrosis: does the occlusal relationship really interfere? A comparison between cone beam computed tomography and dried skulls.
Scariot R; Corso P; Gonsar B; Gill N; Trevillato PC; Potluri A; Vieira AR
Surg Radiol Anat; 2019 Apr; 41(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 30552486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of condylar bone remodeling of temporomandibular joint based on cone-beam CT imaging].
Li Y; Liu MQ; Liu B; Lei J; Fu KY
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32878395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and accuracy of a method for measuring temporomandibular joint condylar volume.
Kim JJ; Lagravere MO; Kaipatur NR; Major PW; Romanyk DL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Apr; 131(4):485-493. PubMed ID: 32950426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone beam computed tomography 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle.
Schlueter B; Kim KB; Oliver D; Sortiropoulos G
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):880-8. PubMed ID: 18298200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography.
Bayram M; Kayipmaz S; Sezgin OS; Küçük M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1812-6. PubMed ID: 21680124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images.
Ludlow JB; Laster WS; See M; Bailey LJ; Hershey HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Apr; 103(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 17395068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection accuracy of condylar defects in cone beam CT images scanned with different resolutions and units.
Zhang ZL; Shi XQ; Ma XC; Li G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(3):20130414. PubMed ID: 24408818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional analysis of the morphological changes of the craniofacial jaw and condyle in patients with idiopathic condylar resorption.
Phyo Thu A; Song S; Karmacharya N; Huang X; Zhou N
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Nov; 61(9):598-604. PubMed ID: 37845098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion.
Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Bieza A; Zepa K; Rogovska I
Stomatologija; 2007; 9(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 17993738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with multislice computed tomography in detection of small osseous condylar defects.
Jones EM; Papio M; Tee BC; Beck FM; Fields HW; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jul; 150(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 27364215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection accuracy of condylar bony defects in Promax 3D cone beam CT images scanned with different protocols.
Zhang ZL; Cheng JG; Li G; Shi XQ; Zhang JZ; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120241. PubMed ID: 23420852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A cone-beam CT investigation on condylar growth in beagle dog treated with Herbst appliance and prostaglandin E2 during late stage of growth].
Huang Z; Huang GS; Wu J; Sang T
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):684-689. PubMed ID: 29972948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
