206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29216811)
1. Phrase Lengths and the Perceived Informativeness of Prosodic Cues in Turkish.
Dinçtopal Deniz N; Fodor JD
Lang Speech; 2017 Dec; 60(4):505-529. PubMed ID: 29216811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Timing of Syntactic and Rhythmic Effects on Ambiguity Resolution in Turkish: A Phoneme Restoration Study.
Deniz ND; Fodor JD
Lang Speech; 2020 Dec; 63(4):832-855. PubMed ID: 31868561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Infants' Processing of Prosodic Cues: Electrophysiological Evidence for Boundary Perception beyond Pause Detection.
Holzgrefe-Lang J; Wellmann C; Höhle B; Wartenburger I
Lang Speech; 2018 Mar; 61(1):153-169. PubMed ID: 28937300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Separability of prosodic phrase boundary and phonemic information.
Nakai S; Turk AE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):966-76. PubMed ID: 21361453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of prosodic boundaries on comprehension of spoken English sentences.
Blasko DG; Hall MD
Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 9760620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Role of Fundamental Frequency and Temporal Envelope in Processing Sentences with Temporary Syntactic Ambiguities.
Sharpe V; Fogerty D; den Ouden DB
Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):399-426. PubMed ID: 28915784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Syntactic structure guides prosody in temporarily ambiguous sentences.
Anderson C; Carlson K
Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 4):472-93. PubMed ID: 21313990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informative prosodic boundaries.
Clifton C; Carlson K; Frazier L
Lang Speech; 2002 Jun; 45(Pt 2):87-114. PubMed ID: 12613557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In Search of Salience: Focus Detection in the Speech of Different Talkers.
Ip MHK; Cutler A
Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):650-680. PubMed ID: 34841933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosodic Variation and Segmental Reduction and Their Roles in Cuing Turn Transition in Swedish.
Zellers M
Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):454-478. PubMed ID: 28915778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents.
Clifton C; Carlson K; Frazier L
Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):854-61. PubMed ID: 17328385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intonational structure as a word-boundary cue in Tokyo Japanese.
Warner N; Otake T; Arai T
Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 1):107-31. PubMed ID: 20415004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intonational Structure Influences Perception of Contrastive Vowel Length: The Case of Phrase-Final Lengthening in Tokyo Japanese.
Steffman J; Katsuda H
Lang Speech; 2021 Dec; 64(4):839-858. PubMed ID: 33251945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. English-speaking preschoolers can use phrasal prosody for syntactic parsing.
de Carvalho A; Lidz J; Tieu L; Bleam T; Christophe A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):EL216. PubMed ID: 27369175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of pitch and timing cues in the perception of phrasal grouping in Seoul Korean.
Jeon HS; Nolan F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3039-49. PubMed ID: 23654407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases.
Gerken L; Jusczyk PW; Mandel DR
Cognition; 1994 Mar; 51(3):237-65. PubMed ID: 8194302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Searching High and Low: Prosodic Breaks Disambiguate Relative Clauses.
Fromont LA; Soto-Faraco S; Biau E
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():96. PubMed ID: 28203214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lexical Segmentation in Artificial Word Learning: The Effects of Converging Sublexical Cues.
Bagou O; Frauenfelder UH
Lang Speech; 2018 Mar; 61(1):3-30. PubMed ID: 29280405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
