These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29216813)

  • 1. Processing Relationships Between Language-Being-Spoken and Other Speech Dimensions in Monolingual and Bilingual Listeners.
    Vaughn CR; Bradlow AR
    Lang Speech; 2017 Dec; 60(4):530-561. PubMed ID: 29216813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listeners' attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception.
    Ingvalson EM; Lansford KL; Federova V; Fernandez G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL234. PubMed ID: 28372098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of English vowels by bilingual Chinese-English and corresponding monolingual listeners.
    Yang J; Fox RA
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):215-37. PubMed ID: 25102607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Language History on Sentence Recognition in Noise or Two-Talker Speech: Monolingual, Early Bilingual, and Late Bilingual Speakers of English.
    Regalado D; Kong J; Buss E; Calandruccio L
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 28(4):935-946. PubMed ID: 31697566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of linguistic and indexical information in improved recognition of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA; McAuliffe MJ; Liss JM; O'Beirne GA; Anderson TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):474-82. PubMed ID: 23297919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of native-language tones on lexical access in the second language.
    Shook A; Marian V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3102. PubMed ID: 27369132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A one-man bilingual cocktail party: linguistic and non-linguistic effects on bilinguals' speech recognition in Mandarin and English.
    Smith ED; Holt LL; Dick F
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jun; 9(1):35. PubMed ID: 38834918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.
    Atagi E; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL44-50. PubMed ID: 25618098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification and discrimination of bilingual talkers across languages.
    Winters SJ; Levi SV; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4524-38. PubMed ID: 18537401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of intelligibility and qualities of non-native accented speakers.
    Fuse A; Navichkova Y; Alloggio K
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 71():37-51. PubMed ID: 29268109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech.
    Iverson P; Wagner A; Pinet M; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL297-303. PubMed ID: 22088031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.
    Rosen S; Hui SN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which Language R You Speaking? /r/ as a Language Marker in Tyrolean and Italian Bilinguals.
    Kaland C; Galatà V; Spreafico L; Vietti A
    Lang Speech; 2019 Mar; 62(1):137-163. PubMed ID: 29233049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
    Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.