These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29217944)

  • 1. Analysis and Economic Implication of X-Ray Film Reject in Diagnostic Radiology Department of Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.
    Zewdu M; Kadir E; Berhane M
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2017 Jul; 27(4):421-426. PubMed ID: 29217944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Films reject analysis for conventional radiography in Iranian main hospitals.
    Roohi Shalemaei R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):220-2. PubMed ID: 21764806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of reject x-ray films as a quality assurance element in diagnostic radiology].
    Lewentat G; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 9198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reject rate analysis in digital radiography: an Australian emergency imaging department case study.
    Atkinson S; Neep M; Starkey D
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Mar; 67(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 31318181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Pediatrics Radiation Dose from Routine X-Ray Examination at Jimma University Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.
    Zewdu M; Kadir E; Berhane M
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2017 Sep; 27(5):481-490. PubMed ID: 29217953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Walcher M; Pohl M; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The radiographer's role in increasing the efficiency of the diagnostic imaging department.
    Racoveanu NT
    Radiography; 1984; 50(592):151-8. PubMed ID: 6463221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of an image quality assurance program.
    Göthlin JH; Alders B
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 4029161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program.
    Gadeholt G; Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Asp T
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 2509204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography reject analysis: data collection methodology, results, and recommendations from an in-depth investigation at two hospitals.
    Foos DH; Sehnert WJ; Reiner B; Siegel EL; Segal A; Waldman DL
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Mar; 22(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 18446413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.
    Andersen ER; Jorde J; Taoussi N; Yaqoob SH; Konst B; Seierstad T
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22287147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital radiography reject analysis of examinations with multiple rejects: an Australian emergency imaging department clinical audit.
    Stephenson-Smith B; Neep MJ; Rowntree P
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 68(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 33826800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study on radiographic repeat rate data of several hospitals in Jeddah.
    Al-Malki MA; Abulfaraj WH; Bhuiyan SI; Kinsara AA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 103(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 12797555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative assessment of digital and analog radiography: diagnostic accuracy, cost analysis and quality of care.
    Colin C; Vergnon P; Guibaud L; Borson O; Pinaudeau D; Perret Du Cray MH; Pasquier JM; Tran-Minh V
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 26(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 9587746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Giacomuzzi SM; Jaschke W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):69-71. PubMed ID: 11487846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination and Analysis of Film Reject Rate at Eight Selected Governmental Diagnostic X-Ray Facilities in Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopian.
    Arbese MY; Abebe TD; Mesele BA
    J Med Phys; 2018; 43(4):270-276. PubMed ID: 30636853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital radiography reject analysis: A comparison between two radiology departments in New Zealand.
    Bantas G; Sweeney RJ; Mdletshe S
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Jun; 70(2):137-144. PubMed ID: 36657740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local diagnostic reference levels for adult posteroanterior (PA) chest x-ray examination in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    Teferi S; Admassie D; Worku A; Zewdeneh D
    Ethiop Med J; 2010 Jan; 48(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20607998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.