These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29218586)

  • 1. Nonparametric tests for equality of psychometric functions.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2226-2255. PubMed ID: 29218586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15190695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of residuals in contingency tables: another nail in the coffin of conditional approaches to significance testing.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Mar; 47(1):147-61. PubMed ID: 24788323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A nonparametric test for equality of survival medians.
    Rahbar MH; Chen Z; Jeon S; Gardiner JC; Ning J
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(9):844-54. PubMed ID: 22302559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive psychophysical methods for nonmonotonic psychometric functions.
    García-Pérez MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):621-41. PubMed ID: 24197504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the analysis of psychometric functions: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1399-420. PubMed ID: 11800465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A test for psychometric function shift.
    Logvinenko AD; Tyurin YN; Sawey M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):503-15. PubMed ID: 22083658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing equivalence with repeated measures: tests of the difference model of two-alternative forced-choice performance.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 14(2):1023-49. PubMed ID: 22059346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.
    Wichmann FA; Hill NJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1293-313. PubMed ID: 11800458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coherent psychometric modelling with Bayesian nonparametrics.
    Karabatsos G; Walker SG
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):1-20. PubMed ID: 17903345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental comparison of parametric versus nonparametric analyses of data from the cold pressor test.
    Treister R; Nielsen CS; Stubhaug A; Farrar JT; Pud D; Sawilowsky S; Oaklander AL
    J Pain; 2015 Jun; 16(6):537-48. PubMed ID: 25801300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitting model-based psychometric functions to simultaneity and temporal-order judgment data: MATLAB and R routines.
    Alcalá-Quintana R; García-Pérez MA
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):972-98. PubMed ID: 23572250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomization-based nonparametric methods for the analysis of multicentre trials.
    LaVange LM; Durham TA; Koch GG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Jun; 14(3):281-301. PubMed ID: 15969304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian active probabilistic classification for psychometric field estimation.
    Song XD; Sukesan KA; Barbour DL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):798-812. PubMed ID: 29256098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of tests for the k-sample, non-decreasing alternative.
    Mahrer JM; Magel RC
    Stat Med; 1995 Apr; 14(8):863-71. PubMed ID: 7644865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standard errors of two-level scalability coefficients.
    Koopman L; Zijlstra BJH; van der Ark LA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):213-236. PubMed ID: 31231795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: a computer simulation.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1969-76. PubMed ID: 10530021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Painfree and accurate Bayesian estimation of psychometric functions for (potentially) overdispersed data.
    Schütt HH; Harmeling S; Macke JH; Wichmann FA
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():105-123. PubMed ID: 27013261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.