694 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29218619)
1. Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative
Goense L; Meziani J; van Rossum PSN; Wessels FJ; Lam MGEH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):2031-2037. PubMed ID: 29218619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limited additional value of cervical ultrasonography over a negative 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Goense L; Meziani J; van Rossum PSN; Wessels FJ; Meijer GJ; Lam MGEH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):645-651. PubMed ID: 29672463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External ultrasonography of the neck does not add diagnostic value to integrated positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Blom RL; Vliegen RF; Schreurs WM; Belgers HJ; Stohr I; Oostenbrug LE; Sosef MN
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Aug; 25(6):555-9. PubMed ID: 22150869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography have a role in cervical nodal staging for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?
Li B; Li N; Liu S; Li Y; Qian B; Zhang Y; He H; Chen X; Sun Y; Xiang J; Hu H; Chen H
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Aug; 160(2):544-550. PubMed ID: 31932053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of 18-F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomographic/Computed Tomographic Imaging in Primary Staging of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity.
Linz C; Brands RC; Herterich T; Hartmann S; Müller-Richter U; Kübler AC; Haug L; Kertels O; Bley TA; Dierks A; Buck AK; Lapa C; Brumberg J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e217083. PubMed ID: 33881529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting the accuracy of
Kutluturk K; Simsek A; Comak A; Gonultas F; Unal B; Kekilli E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 30666022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic role of F-18 FDG PET/CT for preoperative lymph node staging in thyroid cancer patients; A systematic review and metaanalysis.
Kim DH; Kim SJ
Clin Imaging; 2020 Sep; 65():100-107. PubMed ID: 32387798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Value of
Voskuilen CS; Schweitzer D; Jensen JB; Nielsen AM; Joniau S; Muilwijk T; Necchi A; Azizi M; Spiess PE; Briganti A; Bandini M; Goffin K; Bouchelouche K; van Werkhoven E; Shariat SF; Xylinas E; Azawi NH; Ku JH; Foerster B; van Rhijn BWG; Vegt E; Hendricksen K
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 31591037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) for the detection of bone, lung, and lymph node metastases in rhabdomyosarcoma.
Vaarwerk B; Breunis WB; Haveman LM; de Keizer B; Jehanno N; Borgwardt L; van Rijn RR; van den Berg H; Cohen JF; van Dalen EC; Merks JH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Nov; 11(11):CD012325. PubMed ID: 34753195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
Riegger C; Koeninger A; Hartung V; Otterbach F; Kimmig R; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 23002144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and
Noij DP; Martens RM; Zwezerijnen B; Koopman T; de Bree R; Hoekstra OS; de Graaf P; Castelijns JA
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():20-25. PubMed ID: 30292267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Head-to-head comparison of [
Ji M; Ma G; Liu C; Gu B; Du X; Ou X; Xu X; Song S; Yang Z
Cancer Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):56. PubMed ID: 38702821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Which is better for predicting pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer: Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography or a sentinel node biopsy? A retrospective observational study.
Tanaka T; Sasaki S; Tsuchihashi H; Terai Y; Yamamoto K; Yamada T; Ohmichi M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0410. PubMed ID: 29668599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motion-compensated FDG PET/CT for oesophageal cancer.
Voncken FEM; Vegt E; van Sandick JW; van Dieren JM; Grootscholten C; Bartels-Rutten A; Takken SL; Sonke JJ; van de Kamer JB; Aleman BMP
Strahlenther Onkol; 2021 Sep; 197(9):791-801. PubMed ID: 33825916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 30473166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-time point
Park S; Paeng JC; Kang CH; Cheon GJ; Kang KW; Chung JK; Lee DS
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(8):1317-1328. PubMed ID: 29502309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved detection of metastatic lymph nodes in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma by combined interpretation of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.
Lee JY; Kim YH; Park YJ; Park SB; Chung HW; Zo JI; Shim YM; Lee KS; Choi JY
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):40. PubMed ID: 31227017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography Has High Diagnostic Value for Pelvic and Distant Staging in Patients with High-risk Penile Carcinoma.
Ottenhof SR; Djajadiningrat RS; Versleijen MWJ; Donswijk ML; van der Noort V; Brouwer OR; Graafland NM; Vegt E; Horenblas S
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jan; 8(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 33685842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
