BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29218627)

  • 1. Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.
    Carmona-Bayonas A; Jimenez-Fonseca P; Fernández-Somoano A; Álvarez-Manceñido F; Castañón E; Custodio A; de la Peña FA; Payo RM; Valiente LP
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Aug; 20(8):954-965. PubMed ID: 29218627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review.
    Wu R; Glen P; Ramsay T; Martel G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():70. PubMed ID: 24972453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of observational studies of effects of clinical interventions.
    Scott IA; Attia J
    Intern Med J; 2017 Feb; 47(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 27345967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical practices: the seven deadly sins.
    Millis S
    Child Neuropsychol; 2003 Sep; 9(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 13680411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A guide to improve your causal inferences from observational data.
    Raymaekers K; Luyckx K; Moons P
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2020 Dec; 19(8):757-762. PubMed ID: 33040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenges of Assessing Therapeutic or Diagnostic Outcomes with Observational Data.
    Weintraub WS; Yeh RW
    Am J Med; 2018 Feb; 131(2):206-210. PubMed ID: 29103925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misstatements, misperceptions, and mistakes in controlling for covariates in observational research.
    Yu X; Zoh RS; Fluharty DA; Mestre LM; Valdez D; Tekwe CD; Vorland CJ; Jamshidi-Naeini Y; Chiou SH; Lartey ST; Allison DB
    Elife; 2024 May; 13():. PubMed ID: 38752987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IPEG guideline on statistical design and analysis for pharmacodynamic trials. International Pharmaco-EEG Group.
    Ferber G; Abt K; Fichte K; Luthringer R
    Neuropsychobiology; 1999; 39(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 10072666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical data presentation: a primer for rheumatology researchers.
    Misra DP; Zimba O; Gasparyan AY
    Rheumatol Int; 2021 Jan; 41(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 33201265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.
    Desai RJ; Franklin JM
    BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5657. PubMed ID: 31645336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer.
    Stratton IM; Neil A
    Diabet Med; 2005 Apr; 22(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 15787658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential errors and misuse of statistics in studies on leakage in endodontics.
    Lucena C; Lopez JM; Pulgar R; Abalos C; Valderrama MJ
    Int Endod J; 2013 Apr; 46(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 22958068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Research Methodology 2: Observational Clinical Research.
    Sessler DI; Imrey PB
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 26378704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moose on the loose: checklist for meta-analyses of observational studies.
    van Zuuren EJ; Fedorowicz Z
    Br J Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 175(5):853-854. PubMed ID: 27790686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized trials analyzed as observational studies.
    Hernán MA; Hernández-Díaz S; Robins JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Oct; 159(8):560-2. PubMed ID: 24018844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emerging standards in statistical practice: implications for clinical trials in rehabilitation medicine.
    Millis SR
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S32-7. PubMed ID: 14502037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuing use of the terms prospective and retrospective and quality of reporting of observational studies: time to update the STROBE guideline?
    Caram-Deelder C; Kreuger AL; Rosendaal FR; van der Bom JG; Middelburg RA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 45(2):587-9. PubMed ID: 26721602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative and positive data, statistical power, and confidence intervals.
    Andow DA
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 15612273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available?
    Onukwugha E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 23338964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Causal inference from experiment and observation.
    Zwahlen M; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2018 Feb; 21(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 29289944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.