These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29218627)

  • 21. The Certainty Behind Reporting a Significance Result: What the Clinician Should Know.
    Kumbhare D; Alavinia SM
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 98(12):1147-1150. PubMed ID: 31464749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Emulating an RCT in observational research in chest trauma: The target trial approach.
    Cocco AM; Jennings FL; Lockwood D
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(6):951-955. PubMed ID: 34369436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scientific rigour in psycho-oncology trials: why and how to avoid common statistical errors.
    Bell ML; Olivier J; King MT
    Psychooncology; 2013 Mar; 22(3):499-505. PubMed ID: 22315186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On stratification, minimization and protection against types 1 and 2 error.
    Bracken MB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 54(1):104-5. PubMed ID: 11246516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions.
    Brown AW; Kaiser KA; Allison DB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(11):2563-2570. PubMed ID: 29531079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Discrimination and interpretation of errors of experimental designs in medical papers].
    Hu LP; Liu HG
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2007 Nov; 5(6):707-11. PubMed ID: 17997952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Misuse of statistical test in three decades of psychotherapy research.
    Dar R; Serlin RC; Omer H
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1994 Feb; 62(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 8034833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical and clinical significance.
    Connelly LM
    Medsurg Nurs; 2014; 23(2):118-9. PubMed ID: 24933790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Credibility of observational studies: why public health researchers should care?
    Boccia S
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 25(4):554-5. PubMed ID: 26138821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Practice of systematic reviews. VII. Pooling of results from observational studies].
    Zeegers MP; Heisterkamp SH; Kostense PJ; van der Windt DA; Scholten RJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(29):1393-7. PubMed ID: 10923147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Management and interpretation of data obtained from clinical trials in pain management.
    Theodore BR; Gatchel RJ
    Pain Pract; 2008; 8(6):461-72. PubMed ID: 19000174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Observational studies: why are they so important?
    Mariani AW; Pêgo-Fernandes PM
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2014; 132(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24474072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical pitfalls in medical research.
    Nyirongo VB; Mukaka MM; Kalilani-Phiri LV
    Malawi Med J; 2008 Mar; 20(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 19260441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations.
    Hannan EL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jun; 1(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 19463302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls.
    Baccaglini L; Shuster JJ; Cheng J; Theriaque DW; Schoenbach VJ; Tomar SL; Poole C
    Oral Dis; 2010 Apr; 16(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 19874532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science.
    Veldkamp CL; Nuijten MB; Dominguez-Alvarez L; van Assen MA; Wicherts JM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114876. PubMed ID: 25493918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pitfalls in Study Interpretation.
    Gelbard RB; Cripps MW
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2021 Aug; 22(6):646-650. PubMed ID: 34270363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies.
    Brooke BS; Schwartz TA; Pawlik TM
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Aug; 156(8):787-788. PubMed ID: 33825847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.