These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29218627)

  • 41. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies.
    Brooke BS; Schwartz TA; Pawlik TM
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Aug; 156(8):787-788. PubMed ID: 33825847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Statistical significance, power and sample size - what does it all mean?
    Christley RM
    J Small Anim Pract; 2008 Jun; 49(6):263. PubMed ID: 18510495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How to improve statistical analysis in parasitology research publications.
    Morrison DA
    Int J Parasitol; 2002 Jul; 32(8):1065-70. PubMed ID: 12076635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Proper analysis in clinical trials: how to report and adjust for missing outcome data.
    Joshi M; Royuela A; Zamora J
    BJOG; 2013 Jul; 120(8):915-9. PubMed ID: 23759083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
    Schuler MS; Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Avoid lost discoveries, because of violations of standard assumptions, by using modern robust statistical methods.
    Wilcox R; Carlson M; Azen S; Clark F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 23195918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Living with observational data in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Aug; 169(4):591-598. PubMed ID: 31132157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Specifying a Conceptual Treatment Choice Relationship Before Analysis Is Necessary for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
    Cozad MJ; Chapman CG; Brooks JM
    Med Care; 2017 Feb; 55(2):94-96. PubMed ID: 27547948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Guide to the statistical analysis plan.
    Yuan I; Topjian AA; Kurth CD; Kirschen MP; Ward CG; Zhang B; Mensinger JL
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2019 Mar; 29(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 30609103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Experimental toxicology: Issues of statistics, experimental design, and replication.
    Briner W; Kirwan J
    Neurotoxicology; 2017 Jan; 58():137-142. PubMed ID: 27965035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of observational research reports published in Turkish nursing journals.
    Karaçam Z; Şen E; Yildirim B
    Int Nurs Rev; 2015 Sep; 62(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 25801366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The use of large data bases in health care studies.
    Connell FA; Diehr P; Hart LG
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1987; 8():51-74. PubMed ID: 3555530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Analysis of observational studies: a guide to understanding statistical methods.
    Morshed S; Tornetta P; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 May; 91 Suppl 3():50-60. PubMed ID: 19411500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Measures of effect size in the reporting of rehabilitation research.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Barrett KA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1989 Apr; 68(2):52-8. PubMed ID: 2649115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Playing with Data--Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right.
    Sijtsma K
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 25820980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does bad inference drive out good?
    Marozzi M
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2015 Jul; 42(7):727-33. PubMed ID: 25974387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Intentional and Non-Intentional Distortion of Research Findings].
    Kamińska D; Kusztal M
    Polim Med; 2015; 45(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 26630723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.