These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2921989)

  • 21. Performance characteristics of a dual-energy detector for digital scan projection radiography.
    Morgan DR; Sones RA; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 3683301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detective quantum efficiency of x-ray image intensifiers: comparison of scintillation spectrum and rms methods.
    Rowlands JA; Taylor KW
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 6503873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Integrated model for estimating phosphor signal and noise transfer characteristics on medical images: application to CdPO3Cl:Mn phosphor screens.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Nomicos CD
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2002 May; 40(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 12195972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Absorption and noise in cesium iodide x-ray image intensifiers.
    Rowlands JA; Taylor KW
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):786-95. PubMed ID: 6656692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 9608470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Boudry JM; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9029542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging.
    Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Large-area contrast of a fiber-optic coupled x-ray image intensifier.
    Davis VL; Glascock HH
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 882055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of various noise sources on the detective quantum efficiency of phosphor screens.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):887-93. PubMed ID: 2233576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Imaging performance of a digital storage phosphor system.
    Hillen W; Schiebel U; Zaengel T
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):744-51. PubMed ID: 3683303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of phosphor persistence on image quality in digital x-ray scanning systems.
    Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Dec; 25(12):2440-54. PubMed ID: 9874838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A bench-top megavoltage fan-beam CT using CdWO4-photodiode detectors. II. Image performance evaluation.
    Monajemi TT; Tu D; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1090-100. PubMed ID: 16696486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The imaging performance of compact Lu2O3:Eu powdered phosphor screens: Monte Carlo simulation for applications in mammography.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1985-97. PubMed ID: 19610287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
    Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of the Y2O3:Eu3+ scintillator for application in medical x-ray detectors and image receptors.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Evangelou EK; Nomicos CD
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1965-75. PubMed ID: 8994161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system.
    Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Star-Lack JM; Heanue JA; Betts TD; Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2728-43. PubMed ID: 16964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Polycrystalline CdZnTe thick films for low energy x-ray: system evaluation.
    Yuk S; Park SW; Yi Y
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1990-3. PubMed ID: 17946080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Digital thorax radiography: flat-panel detector or storage phosphor plates].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Sailer J; Kabalan N; Herold C; Prokop M
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):351-61. PubMed ID: 12764583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.