142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29220019)
1. Amgen cholesterol antibody feud could kill key IP rule.
Ratner M
Nat Biotechnol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1118-1119. PubMed ID: 29220019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biotechnology products and university-based science.
Sobolski GK
JAMA; 2005 Jun; 293(23):2862; author reply 2863. PubMed ID: 15956629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biotechnology products and university-based science.
Korn D; Heinig SJ
JAMA; 2005 Jun; 293(23):2862-3; author reply 2863. PubMed ID: 15956628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Enforcing pharmaceutical and biotech patent rights in China.
Zhang YP; Deng MM
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1235-40. PubMed ID: 18997760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Obvious to try": a proper patentability standard in the pharmaceutical arts?
Trask AV
Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Apr; 76(5):2625-68. PubMed ID: 18546581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Patent rights and the free research. The boundary between basic research and private sector is not longer razor-sharp].
Westerlund L
Lakartidningen; 2005 Sep 26-Oct 2; 102(39):2737. PubMed ID: 16245544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biotechnology patent disputes. Market machinations.
Gershon D
Nature; 1990 Apr; 344(6269):800. PubMed ID: 2330035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cabilly patent finale.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Aug; 26(8):846. PubMed ID: 18688222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biotechnology products and university-based science.
Lempert P
JAMA; 2005 Jun; 293(23):2861-2; author reply 2863. PubMed ID: 15956627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. India's IP snub.
Jayaraman KS
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 26(4):362. PubMed ID: 18392000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Ganske" threatens biotechnology patents worldwide.
Glaser V
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Feb; 15(2):121. PubMed ID: 9035128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patent fight sparks biological warfare in the drug industry.
Fortune; 2000 Jul; 142(3):40, 42. PubMed ID: 11066662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patent prosecution of biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents in a changing legal landscape.
Lu DL; Kowalski TJ; Jarecki-Black J
Future Med Chem; 2010 Jan; 2(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 21426040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Robert Stoll. Interview by Charlotte Harrison.
Stoll R
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2009 Dec; 8(12):926. PubMed ID: 19949397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. China tightens IP protection, but concerns linger.
Jia H
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Sep; 27(9):787-8. PubMed ID: 19741619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Court upholds infringement of research tool patents, but discounts damages.
Maebius SB; Warburg RJ
Pharmacogenomics; 2003 Jul; 4(4):369-70. PubMed ID: 12831314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Obviousness, hindsight and perspective: the impact of KSR v. Teleflex on biotech and pharmaceutical patents.
Teitelbaum R; Cohen M
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Oct; 25(10):1105-6. PubMed ID: 17921990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem.
Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A
Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. US courts narrow patent exemptions.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):834. PubMed ID: 12894182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Proposed changes to patent code loom over biotech industry.
Coombs A
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1333-4. PubMed ID: 18066010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
