131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29221538)
1. Making Online Outbreak Surveillance Work for all.
Wang YA; Barry M
Ann Glob Health; 2017; 83(3-4):625-629. PubMed ID: 29221538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Interfacing a biosurveillance portal and an international network of institutional analysts to detect biological threats.
Riccardo F; Shigematsu M; Chow C; McKnight CJ; Linge J; Doherty B; Dente MG; Declich S; Barker M; Barboza P; Vaillant L; Donachie A; Mawudeku A; Blench M; Arthur R
Biosecur Bioterror; 2014; 12(6):325-36. PubMed ID: 25470464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital disease detection: A systematic review of event-based internet biosurveillance systems.
O'Shea J
Int J Med Inform; 2017 May; 101():15-22. PubMed ID: 28347443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation System of a Biosurveillance System in the Republic of Korea and Its Legal Ramifications.
Kim AJ; Tak S
Health Secur; 2019; 17(6):462-467. PubMed ID: 31800333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An overview of internet biosurveillance.
Hartley DM; Nelson NP; Arthur RR; Barboza P; Collier N; Lightfoot N; Linge JP; van der Goot E; Mawudeku A; Madoff LC; Vaillant L; Walters R; Yangarber R; Mantero J; Corley CD; Brownstein JS
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2013 Nov; 19(11):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23789639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developing open source, self-contained disease surveillance software applications for use in resource-limited settings.
Campbell TC; Hodanics CJ; Babin SM; Poku AM; Wojcik RA; Skora JF; Coberly JS; Mistry ZS; Lewis SH
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Sep; 12():99. PubMed ID: 22950686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing performance of internet-based biosurveillance systems used in epidemic intelligence for early detection of infectious diseases outbreaks.
Barboza P; Vaillant L; Le Strat Y; Hartley DM; Nelson NP; Mawudeku A; Madoff LC; Linge JP; Collier N; Brownstein JS; Astagneau P
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90536. PubMed ID: 24599062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory-guided detection of disease outbreaks: three generations of surveillance systems.
Sintchenko V; Gallego B
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Jun; 133(6):916-25. PubMed ID: 19492884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biosurveillance in outbreak investigations.
Kaydos-Daniels SC; Rojas Smith L; Farris TR
Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Mar; 11(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 23448272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new statistical early outbreak detection method for biosurveillance and performance comparisons.
Cengiz Ü; Karahasan M
Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(27):5236-5258. PubMed ID: 31588592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving Biosurveillance Systems to Enable Situational Awareness During Public Health Emergencies.
Nuzzo JB
Health Secur; 2017; 15(1):17-19. PubMed ID: 28092456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the continuum of event-based biosurveillance through an operational lens.
Corley CD; Lancaster MJ; Brigantic RT; Chung JS; Walters RA; Arthur RR; Bruckner-Lea CJ; Calapristi A; Dowling G; Hartley DM; Kennedy S; Kircher A; Klucking S; Lee EK; McKenzie T; Nelson NP; Olsen J; Pancerella C; Quitugua TN; Reed JT; Thomas CS
Biosecur Bioterror; 2012 Mar; 10(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 22320664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?
Pollett S; Althouse BM; Forshey B; Rutherford GW; Jarman RG
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2017 Nov; 11(11):e0005871. PubMed ID: 29190281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expanding veterinary biosurveillance in Washington, DC: The creation and utilization of an electronic-based online veterinary surveillance system.
Hennenfent A; DelVento V; Davies-Cole J; Johnson-Clarke F
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Mar; 138():70-78. PubMed ID: 28237237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biosurveillance of emerging biothreats using scalable genotype clustering.
Gallego B; Sintchenko V; Wang Q; Hiley L; Gilbert GL; Coiera E
J Biomed Inform; 2009 Feb; 42(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 18723122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Conceptual Architecture for National Biosurveillance: Moving Beyond Situational Awareness to Enable Digital Detection of Emerging Threats.
Velsko S; Bates T
Health Secur; 2016; 14(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 27314659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated biosurveillance data from England and Wales, 1991-2011.
Enki DG; Noufaily A; Garthwaite PH; Andrews NJ; Charlett A; Lane C; Farrington CP
Emerg Infect Dis; 2013 Jan; 19(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 23260848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The human-animal interface and zoonotic threats: the Russian Federation approach.
McNamara T; Platonov A; Elleman T; Gresham L
Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Sep; 11(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 24041194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chinese Public Attention to the Outbreak of Ebola in West Africa: Evidence from the Online Big Data Platform.
Liu K; Li L; Jiang T; Chen B; Jiang Z; Wang Z; Chen Y; Jiang J; Gu H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 27527196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structural models used in real-time biosurveillance outbreak detection and outbreak curve isolation from noisy background morbidity levels.
Cheng KE; Crary DJ; Ray J; Safta C
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013 May; 20(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 23037798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
